AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Theodore Faulders

PHIL100 · PHIL101 · PHIL111 · PHIL112 · PHIL5736 · PHILL111 · PHILO102 · PHIL102 · PHIL10231562 · ANCIENTPHILO · PHIL · PHILOS102 · PHIL6363 · PHSCPHSC · PHIL200 · 53 lifetime ratings

AI rating
81/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
83.33%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

Take him if you want engaging discussion and , but expect a .

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaringDiscussion HeavyChristian BiasFair TestsRemembers Names
  • Many students call him brilliant, caring, and life-changing in philosophy and religion courses.
  • A recurring critique is strong Christian or Catholic bias that can alienate some students.
  • , and showing effort usually yields a solid grade without extreme difficulty.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

64/100

Homework and effort unlock As for many, but some say a true A requires hard work while a B is easier.

; no online reviews were analyzed.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Material is manageable with reading and notes, though critical thinking and religion debates add intellectual load.

; no online reviews were analyzed.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

48/100

after class, yet some sections list it as not mandatory.

; no online reviews were analyzed.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

Strong majority praise him as inspirational and fair, tempered by consistent bias complaints and about 83 percent take-again.

; no online reviews were analyzed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

70/100

and fair tests reward .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Regular homework, papers, and of overwhelm.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Warm lectures and deep discussion win most students, while bias and uneven focus pull some scores down.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

Mix of , and a .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person philosophy and world religions classes mix lively discussion, name recognition, and .

Main concern

Christian bias and occasional pressure to debate faith-related views.

What students said

“Professor Faulders was one of the . , and hilarious inside the classroom.”
PHIL111
“Do the homework and you'll get an A no problem.”
PHIL102
“he essentially teaches that all other religions are bogus except for Christianity.”
PHIL102

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests are generally described as fair and , and discussion engagement.

Few TestsPapersHomework DrivenDiscussion Based

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person sections typically use a small number of tests plus papers and .

Few TestsPapersHomework DrivenDiscussion Based
“The see u engage in class”
PHIL102
“3 tests, two papers and alot of homework.”
PHIL102

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Dr. Faulders is, hands down, the . He inspired me to work hard and value my thoughts and ideas.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 in-person reviews, balancing inspiration against bias notes. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“ and you'll feel smarter after.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

76/100

“ and thoughts about hw and assignments.”

⚖️

70/100

“Faulders makes getting an A a very achievable goal. He tells you exactly what you need to do”

⚠️ Bias Concern

40/100

“Real easy grade but EXTREMELY biased, and for some reason he likes to make up lies as he speak”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He will remember all his students’ names by the 3rd week
  • Great sense of humor and respects

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • just show up for class and turn in and read the book, you will give an A easily
  • Don't expect to get an A in this class unless you want to work hard for it
  • It's not hard to get an A for his class if you good at logic

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • , and hilarious
  • genuinely care about them

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

53

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

and fairness while also repeatedly documenting religious bias.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 534
4 out of 511
3 out of 55
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

PHIL10225 reviews
PHIL1117 reviews
PHIL1002 reviews
PHIL1012 reviews
PHIL2002 reviews
Show 10 more courses
PHILL1112 reviews
PHILO1022 reviews
ANCIENTPHILO1 review
PHIL1 review
PHIL102315621 review
PHIL1121 review
PHIL57361 review
PHIL63631 review
PHILOS1021 review
PHSCPHSC1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 3

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 2 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not_Sure_Yet 1