AI Rate Professor

Marketing

Shelby Arthur

MKT215 · FIN100 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
31/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Avoid unless you need the course and are ready for .

Best fit · Effort For RewardUnorganized OnlineTough GraderHeavy Weekly WorkloadLong TestsPassive Aggressive
  • Online courses are frequently unorganized with broken submit links and view-only forms.
  • Expect , and long midterms or finals.
  • Grades can still land high if you grind the work, but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Students can still earn A or A+ but only after heavy weekly work and .

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content difficulty sits mid-range, but volume of , and suggest.

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

58/100

Two online reviews mark attendance not mandatory while .

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

, and unorganized online logistics outweigh one milder positive review.

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

and detailed expectations mean partial effort rarely gets easy marks.

Format shift

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Weekly discussions, double-week assignment dumps, and .

Format shift

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Teaching experience

Poor

36/100

Students cite outdated material, missing submit access, and .

Format shift

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Weekly discussions and and a .

Format shift

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online FIN and and workload-heavy, with thorough weekly posts and long tests.

Main concern

Missing submit buttons, view-only forms, and passive-aggressive unorganized delivery kill the easy-A expectation.

What students said

“ . Off the back with old information. . Passive aggressive.”
FIN100
“I took this class online as an "easy A class". Turns out its a lot of work per week”
FIN100
“Wants very thorough and and weekly assignments.”
MKT215

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are described as very long and .

TEST HEAVYLong MidtermsLong FinalWeekly Discussions

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online students report thorough weekly posts plus very long midterms and finals.

TEST HEAVYLong MidtermsLong FinalWeekly Assignments
“ and final.”
MKT215
“Wants very thorough and and weekly assignments.”
MKT215

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . Off the back with old information. . Passive aggressive.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 online reviews, highlighting disorganization, heavy work, and test load. Credibility rating: Low.

⚠️ Organization Crisis

36/100

“ . Passive aggressive.”

📚 Workload Shock

22/100

“Turns out its a lot of work per week, some weeks .”

📝

42/100

“ and final.”

Theme 1

🗂️ About Organization

  • . Passive aggressive.
  • she won't have the submit button active or she will forget to change a form to edit instead of view only.

Theme 2

📈 About Workload & Grades

  • Lots of homework
  • I took this class online as an "easy A class". Turns out its a lot of work per week
  • but a lot to go through.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only three online reviews spanning 2018-2026 with mixed grades and limited detail reduce confidence.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

FIN1002 reviews
MKT2151 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values