AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Catalina Yang

MATH117 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

and unmanaged group deadlines create a frustrating experience.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerUnclear explanationsLots of homeworkConfusingGroup project issuesNot recommended
  • Single review calls her the .
  • .
  • and confusion make the course feel hard and unrewarding.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Lots of for a good grade.

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

Difficulty rated 4 with .

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

review.

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

and labels her the .

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

40/100

; confusion around expectations is the main issue.

Format shift

Based on one in-person review.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

LOTS OF and heavy workload comments dominate.

Format shift

Based on one in-person review.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Described as and failed answers to questions.

Format shift

Based on one in-person review.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Homework and a group project are highlighted; .

Format shift

Based on one in-person review.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person MATH117 felt intentionally confusing with lots of homework and .

Main concern

and .

What students said

“Honestly worst teacher I have ever had. and uses empty phrases so she fails answers questions.”
MATH117

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews ; group project mishandling is the noted risk.

Group projectsHeavy homework

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; group project deadlines were mentioned then poorly managed.

Group projects
“She mentioned our group project at the beginning of the semester and then just stood there and let everyone miss the deadlines.”
MATH117

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Honestly worst teacher I have ever had. and uses empty phrases so she fails answers questions.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review, highlighting unclear teaching and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

12/100

“Honestly worst teacher I have ever had. and uses empty phrases so she fails answers questions.”

📚 Workload

22/100

“LOTS OF HOMEWORK”

👎

8/100

“No”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and uses empty phrases
  • She is

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • LOTS OF HOMEWORK
  • let everyone miss the deadlines

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

Only one detailed 2018 review exists, so findings are directionally strong but statistically thin.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH1171 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values