AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

George Egbert

MATH160 · CALC150 · MATH117 · MATH150 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
20%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

Avoid unless you are already strong in calculus and can thrive despite harsh teaching.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderRude and demeaningTest heavyHard to get helpSkip class? You won't pass
  • Many students describe rude, demeaning classroom behavior and humiliation
  • and frequent pop quizzes
  • Self-teaching is common because

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

14/100

, and many B/C/D/F outcomes make an A rare even for strong students.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

18/100

Students call the class impossible, test-heavy, and far harder than expected for the level.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

Attendance is repeatedly marked mandatory with skip-class warnings.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

16/100

Most reviews urge not to take him due to rudeness, poor teaching, and .

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

, and first-time low grades for former A students dominate reviews.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Lots of , and high-stakes tests create heavy load.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Majority describe ineffective lectures, refused help, and demeaning or offensive comments.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

, and test-heavy grading over assignments.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person calc and precalc reviews are overwhelmingly negative on respect, clarity, and grade outcomes.

Main concern

Rude treatment, hard tests, and .

What students said

“He is a very rude teacher. He will get mad if you ask him for help or clarification”
MATH150
“You basically teach yourself calculus.”
CALC150
“Also half of the class failed this class.”
MATH150

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and and are widely described as very hard with little teaching support.

Hard testsPop quizzesTest heavyShow your work

Assessment risk

Strict

22/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and frequent, with pop quizzes and .

Hard testsPop quizzesTest heavy
“The class is test heavy and you basically have to teach yourself the stuff”
MATH150
“ ! !”
CALC150

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This is one of the . He is rude and is constantly putting you down. Does not help you when you ask.”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 in-person , and self-teaching. Credibility rating: High.

🚫 Teaching Quality

18/100

“Very ineffective at any teaching. You basically teach yourself calculus.”

👎 Recommendation Rate

16/100

“ ”

⚖️

12/100

“I am a straight A student who received their first C in the class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He does not teach well enough to understand the materials
  • he often skirts answering questions
  • you basically have to teach yourself the stuff

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • This class was impossible.
  • ! !
  • half of the class failed this class

Theme 3

💔 About Classroom Climate

  • makes demeaning jokes regarding race, sexuality, and gender
  • constantly putting you down
  • makes fun of his students

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Fourteen detailed, consistent negative in-person reviews across several years strongly agree on tone and difficulty.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 54
1 out of 58

Course coverage

CALC1506 reviews
MATH1505 reviews
MATH1602 reviews
MATH1171 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

6

B+ 2 · B 3 · B- 1

C range

3

C+ 2 · C 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values