AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Richard Neufeld

MATH103 · MATH117 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
94/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you will keep up weekly; and fair effort-to-grade payoff.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear LecturesWork for Your AWeekly QuizzesHelpful and FunnyReal-Life Stats
  • Students call lectures clear and and even fun.
  • , but weekly quizzes and .
  • An A is earned through consistent effort, .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Students report strong grades including A and A+, but stress that you must put in consistent work for the A.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Stats and math content is presented clearly with real-life applications, so challenge is moderate rather than brutal.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

, and tags warn that skipping class hurts success.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

95/100

Every review is strongly positive, with 100% would-take-again among those who answered and .

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

68/100

Graded by few things with weekly quizzes and tests; fair if you keep up, not an automatic free A.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

75/100

Homework is often optional or only about 20 questions, with the main load in weekly quizzes and chapter tests.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

Students , and ability to make stats click.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Grade centers on weekly quizzes and tests after each .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person math/stats with clear chapter lectures, weekly quizzes, chapter tests, and recommended but .

Main concern

You are expected to retain prior chapters; falling behind means catching up in office hours.

What students said

“ ! I was so scared of stats because I suck at math, but he was the .”
MATH117
“His lectures are clear. He takes a quiz at the start of the week, and takes a , but recommended.”
MATH103
“You will work for your A, but if you get it, you will feel nothing short of accomplished.”
MATH117

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Regular weekly quizzes and open-book or proctoring details given.

Weekly QuizzesChapter TestsIn-Person Assessments

Assessment risk

Standard

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and chapter tests; reviews do not clearly prove open-book or special proctoring.

Weekly QuizzesChapter TestsGraded by Few Things
“He takes a , and takes a ”
MATH103
“There's a and homework is only 20 questions.”
MATH117

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ! I was so scared of stats because I suck at math, but he was the . I tried really hard and got an A+!”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person , and fair effort-to-grade payoff. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

92/100

“He was a great teacher and .”

👍 Recommendation

95/100

“Basically he's just a young dorky professor that's good at teaching math!”

📈 Effort for Grades

58/100

“You will work for your A, but if you get it, you will feel nothing short of accomplished.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • Neufeld was so so much.
  • He tries to make math interesting and pairs us up occasionally.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • You will work for your A, but if you get it, you will feel nothing short of accomplished.
  • I tried really hard and got an A+!
  • , but recommended.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Only 4 detailed reviews, but they are consistent, recent enough as a cluster, and highly aligned in tone.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH1173 reviews
MATH1031 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1