AI Rate Professor

English

Rosanne Boardman

ENG80 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
2.1

The decision

Only consider her for a low-stakes pass/no-pass English class if you want leniency; otherwise look elsewhere.

Best fit · Easy A HunterBoring lecturesLenient for someMandatory attendancePass/no-pass riskFriendly but uneven
  • Many students call lectures boring and say she reads handouts more than she teaches.
  • some pass with late work, others report no-pass despite submitting portfolios.
  • Attendance and participation often matter, and recommendation rate is low overall.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

48/100

Some students pass with late essays and low effort, but others report no-pass or F despite submitting work.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Content is not intellectually hard, but dull long lectures and writing requirements still frustrate students.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

and tags warn that skipping means you will not pass.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

and several students explicitly say never take her again after no-pass outcomes.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

58/100

Often forgiving on deadlines and late work, yet some report harsh no-pass results after submissions.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

72/100

Essays, portfolio, and ; several students did minimal work and still passed.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

34/100

Students repeatedly call lectures boring; and rarely uses the board.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

, and participation rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person ENG80 is often boring with long lectures; she can be sweet and deadline-flexible, but some students still fail or get no-pass after submitting work.

Main concern

Unpredictable pass/no-pass grading and .

What students said

“An awful teacher. Very boring lecture, even though you submit all the eassy, she also give you a no pass.”
ENG80
“If your looking for a easy and minimal effort class this is the class to take.”
ENG80
“As long as you show up and do the work you'll pass !”
ENG80

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment centers on essays and portfolio submission with .

Essay portfolioHomeworkParticipation

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person ENG80 grades through essays, portfolio, homework, and class .

Essay portfolioHomeworkParticipation
“I submitted my portfolio but she still give me a no pass, I don't why.”
ENG80
“If you do the .”
ENG80

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“An awful teacher. Very boring lecture, even though you submit all the eassy, she also give you a no pass.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 in-person reviews, highlighting boring lectures and uneven pass outcomes. Credibility rating: High.

😴 Lecture Quality

34/100

“Very boring lecture.”

⚠️

48/100

“I submitted my portfolio but she still give me a no pass, I don't why.”

👍 Low Recommendation

28/100

“ ! Never!!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very boring lecture
  • really long lectures
  • she (reads) more than lecture

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • easy and minimal effort class
  • submit all the eassy, she also give you a no pass
  • As long as you show up and do the work you'll pass

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • very sweet old lady
  • nice as a
  • clearly care about her students

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Nine in-person reviews across several years show consistent boredom complaints and .

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ENG808 reviews
616481 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

2

Audit/No Grade 1 · Incomplete 1