AI Rate Professor

English As A Second Language

Deborah Alexander

ESL54561 · ESL162 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
72/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Good pick for ESL writing help if you participate consistently, but note one very negative warning.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyHelpful feedbackEssay writing focusParticipation mattersMixed reviewsNice and clear
  • Most students praise her as a and thinking.
  • Participation matters and skipping is risky according to tags and comments.
  • One strong , so experiences are not fully uniform.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Positive students earned A-/B+ with effort, while one withdrew and called the .

Online evidence is more positive; and one hard warning.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

and thinking practice; difficulty ratings range from easy to hard.

Online review rated difficulty higher; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Tags and reviews stress participation and that skipping means you will not pass.

Both formats mention participation risk; online and .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

70/100

Most reviewers call her great for essay writing, but one extreme negative review lowers confidence.

Online student would take again; warning.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

60/100

Students report solid grades with feedback, but one withdrawal and as generous.

Format shift

Online student earned A-; + and .

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Essay writing, participation, and topic thinking work drive the course rather than a featherlight load.

Format shift

No major workload split beyond one online note that participation matters.

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

, and strong at teaching essays; one student strongly disagrees.

Format shift

Online review is highly positive; .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

Comments , and participation rather than exam-heavy assessment.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize writing and participation over exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person ESL writing classes are often praised for essay instruction, though one student .

Main concern

and contrasts with the positive writing-focused feedback.

What students said

“she taught me and how to think about the topic”
ESL54561
“i have to give a warning to everyone, never never never try her class. remember never!”
ESL54561

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Online ESL162 student found her helpful, funny, and , while noting participation matters.

Main concern

Only one online review, so confidence is limited.

What students said

“Really helpful and very nice. Funny and ”
ESL162

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews focus on essay and paper writing with participation expectations; .

Essay writingParticipationFeedback on papers

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and paper thinking; reviews do not clearly describe closed-book exam rules.

Essay writingPaper feedback
“She taught me about ”
ESL54561
“she taught me and how to think about the topic”
ESL54561

Online

Online ESL162 evidence mentions helpful feedback and participation importance but does not prove webcam or Lockdown Browser use.

Participation mattersGood feedback
“Really helpful and very nice. Funny and ”
ESL162

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Mrs. Alexander is a great teacher - she taught me and how to think about the topic.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews (1 online, 3 in-person), highlighting writing help and one strong warning. Credibility rating: Medium.

✍️ Writing Instruction

76/100

“she taught me and how to think about the topic”

👍 Overall Recommendation

70/100

“Really helpful and very nice. Funny and ”

⚠️ Split Experience

40/100

“i have to give a warning to everyone, never never never try her class. remember never!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Funny and
  • very good for my ESL course
  • truly a great teacher

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Participation matters
  • Skip class? You won't pass.
  • never never never try her class

Theme 3

✍️ About Writing Skills

  • taught me about
  • taught me
  • how to think about the topic

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Four reviews with both online and in-person evidence, but one extreme outlier and limited detail lower consistency.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ESL545613 reviews
ESL1621 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

2

B+ 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1