AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Matthew Bixby

PHIL203 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
88/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Great pick for philosophy majors who will do the reading and , but only two reviews exist.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerClear class notesFair exams from notesHeavy philosophy readingTake-home final essayAccessible and caring
  • Highly praised contemporary philosophy instructor with and fair exams
  • Course is reading-heavy but guided and structured
  • Tiny sample size means confidence should stay cautious

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

56/100

Both reviewers earned A- grades with fair exams, but success still requires keeping up with .

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Contemporary philosophy with serious reading is intellectually demanding .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

as mandatory and emphasize staying on track in class.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

92/100

Both students call the course essential and praise him as bright, responsive, and caring.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

72/100

and fair exams are highlighted; grades look strong when work is done.

Format shift

Based only on in-person comments.

Workload

Heavy

34/100

Students warn you .

Format shift

Based only on in-person comments.

Teaching experience

Excellent

91/100

, and excellent at guiding dense material.

Format shift

Based only on in-person comments.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Course mixes note-based exams with a .

Format shift

Based only on in-person comments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person PHIL203 is described as rigorous, well-guided contemporary philosophy with and fair testing.

Main concern

Serious reading load and .

What students said

“His class notes for and concise. The .”
PHIL203
“Do the readings. and there's one 3k essay as the .”
PHIL203

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams track the notes closely and the a high-security test.

Exams from notesTake-home final essayClear grading criteria

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe note-aligned exams and a .

Exams from notesTake-home finalClear grading criteria
“The exams are right from the notes. on your favorite philosopher.”
PHIL203
“ and there's one 3k essay as the .”
PHIL203

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Matthew Bixby is a young new addition to the philosophy department. His course in History of Contemporary Philosophy is a must for any philosophy major or minor.”

Voice snapshots generated from only 2 highly positive in-person PHIL203 reviews. Credibility rating: Low.

📚 Teaching Quality

91/100

“ and caring.”

📝

78/100

“His class notes for and concise. The .”

📖 Workload

34/100

“ keeps you on track and guides you through some serious reading in contemporary philosophy.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and caring
  • His class notes for and concise
  • keeps you on track

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Do the readings

Theme 3

🧪 About Exams

  • The
  • as the

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

32/100

Evidence confidence

Only two glowing 2016 reviews exist, so enthusiasm is high but sample size is too small for strong confidence.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHIL2032 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A- 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values