AI Rate Professor

Ethnic Studies

Ambi Harsha

ASAM101 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

unless you can teach yourself the material.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear and disorganizedHard graderSelf-taught requiredDoes not careEnthusiastic but ineffective
  • Single review calls the class one of the .
  • and .
  • Grades hard relative to unclear instruction; .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

40/100

Student earned an A- only .

All ; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Difficulty is moderate, but should be.

All .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

as .

All .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

The only review and .

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

Described as .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Workload details are sparse; .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Enthusiastic but .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Review ; grades feel harsh overall.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

One in-person ASAM101 review reports enthusiastic but and little student care.

Main concern

and perceived favoritism.

What students said

“He's enthusiastic, but this is one of the . He needs to consider a and .”
ASAM101
“He grades hard for someone so unclear. I had to on my own.”
ASAM101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Genuinely shocked Ambi got great reviews at UCSB. He's enthusiastic, but this is one of the . !”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review only. Credibility rating: Low.

💥 Teaching Quality

28/100

“He needs to consider a and .”

🚫 Recommendation

15/100

“ ! He doesn't care about you unless you're an international student.”

⚖️

30/100

“He grades hard for someone so unclear. I had to on my own.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He's enthusiastic, but this is one of the .
  • He needs to consider a and .
  • I had to on my own.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • He grades hard for someone so unclear.
  • !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

Only one 2016 review with limited detail; cannot confirm patterns across students or time.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ASAM1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values