AI Rate Professor

Business

Matt St. George

IBUS62161 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Decent option if and stay on top of weekly quizzes, but the thin review record leaves uncertainty.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful When ContactedWeekly Quizzes And ForumsApproachable Business InstructorStraightforward Class
  • Very limited sample of only two short reviews.
  • Weekly quizzes and forum posts structure the course.
  • Students report he is helpful if you reach out and one earned an A.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

66/100

One student earned an A with weekly quizzes and outreach, but comments do not describe a free A or heavy grade struggle.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Difficulty ratings sit mid-range with routine quizzes and forums rather than extreme conceptual load.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

as mandatory with no counter-evidence of optional policy.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

70/100

Both reviews are positive and describe a good, helpful class, but they are too brief for a .

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

An A is reported with regular quiz and forum work; .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Weekly quizzes plus forum posts .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Students call the class good and say he is very helpful when contacted, with little detail on lecture craft.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Weekly quizzes and forum posts dominate the .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Sparse in-person feedback notes , and an overall good class experience.

Main concern

Extremely few reviews make expectations hard to verify.

What students said

“Weekly quizzes and if you reach out to him”
IBUS62161
“Good class”
101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize weekly quizzes and .

Weekly quizzesForum posts

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and forum posts without describing proctoring or .

Weekly quizzesForum posts
“Weekly quizzes and if you reach out to him”
IBUS62161

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Weekly quizzes and if you reach out to him”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 sparse in-person reviews, highlighting helpfulness and weekly assessment structure. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Helpfulness

72/100

“Weekly quizzes and if you reach out to him”

👍 Overall Tone

70/100

“Good class”

📝 Assessment Rhythm

55/100

“Weekly quizzes and if you reach out to him”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • very helpful if you reach out to him
  • Good class

Theme 2

📈 About Workload And Grades

  • Weekly quizzes and forum posts
  • A

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

32/100

Evidence confidence

Only two short reviews from 2015-2016 with almost no detail, tags, or .

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

1011 review
IBUS621611 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values