AI Rate Professor

Graphic Arts

Linda Lowell

PHOTO12 · PHOT250 · PHOT18054074 · GDP118 · PHOT280 · PHOTOPORT · PHOTO109 · DIGITALDARKROO · PHOTO1 · PHOT109 · PHOTO260 · PHOTO285 · PHOTOGRAPHY · PHOTO250 · DARKROOM · PHOT260 · PHOT180 · PHOTO63 · PH250 · PHOTO180 · DIGDARK · 36 lifetime ratings

AI rating
36/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

if you are a serious photography student who can handle subjective critiques and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerSubjective GraderSlow FeedbackPolarizing CritiquesFavorites MentalitySerious Photo Only
  • Grading often feels personal and .
  • and inspiring for committed photo students.
  • Communication and timely .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Even strong students report subjective taste-based marks, redos, and , so an A is not low-effort.

Online and ; online mentions redo options more often.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

Photo and digital darkroom work is described as challenging, critique-heavy, and aimed at serious students.

; online difficulty ratings are also high.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Multiple reviews mark attendance mandatory and as non-negotiable.

Evidence is similar online and in .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

34/100

A large share of detailed reviews warn against her for communication and .

Online has more mixed praise; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

24/100

Many students say grades follow personal taste, favorites, or vague critiques rather than stated criteria.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

Expect regular projects, critiques, and .

Format shift

Online reviews highlight redo opportunities; .

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Some find critiques transformative, but many describe unprofessional communication, late grades, and .

Format shift

Online often praises lecture notes and videos; in-person negatives dominate volume.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

, and redos rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

30 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

some credit life-changing vision and critiques, many report rude critiques, late grades, and favoritism.

Main concern

Harsh or , and .

What students said

“This class taught me more than just photography, she taught me to see.”
PHOT250
“Absolutely do not waste your time in her classes, she will ruin your GPA.”
PHOTO250

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online photo classes get strong praise for detailed feedback and redo options, but also sharp .

Main concern

Inconsistent grading and contact.

What students said

“The and obvious.”
PHOTO250
“Grades after personal taste and can be mean in .”
PHOT18054074

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews rarely describe formal exams and and critiques.

Project CritiquesAssignment RedosLittle Exam Detail

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews focus on critiques and stated.

Studio CritiquesLate Project Grades
“She grades based on her own personal art tastes (very closeminded & outdated).”
DARKROOM

Online

Online comments emphasize assignments, chat help, and redo options more than proctored exams.

Assignment RedosDetailed Critiques
“There is an option to re-do the you do that.”
PHOTO250

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Got an A in her class and I still can say it was the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 36 reviews, highlighting grading, critiques, and communication themes. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“Terrible teacher... all were unbelievably slow to .”

⚖️

24/100

“Grades after personal taste and can be mean in .”

💎 Hidden Strength

70/100

“This class taught me more than just photography, she taught me to see.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She puts a lot of .
  • Often goes on long unhelpful tangents.
  • Critiques are contradictory to instructions.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • You really have to earn your grade.
  • Expects students to REDO every project in order to get an A.
  • Grades based on her own personal art tastes.

Theme 3

📬 About Communication

  • .
  • Communication w/Linda is impossible.
  • Refuses to communicate and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

36

Recent reviews read by the AI

36

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-six reviews span many years with and communication.

Inside 36 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 55
3 out of 52
2 out of 56
1 out of 511

Course coverage

PHOTO2506 reviews
PHOT2504 reviews
PHOT2803 reviews
DIGITALDARKROO2 reviews
PHOT1092 reviews
Show 17 more courses
PHOT1802 reviews
PHOTO1092 reviews
214600771 review
DARKROOM1 review
DIGDARK1 review
GDP1181 review
PH2501 review
PHOT180540741 review
PHOT2601 review
PHOTO11 review
PHOTO121 review
PHOTO1801 review
PHOTO2601 review
PHOTO2851 review
PHOTO631 review
PHOTOGRAPHY1 review
PHOTOPORT1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 1 · A 3 · A- 2

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 1 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values