AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Judy Mouderres

MATH · MATH160 · MATH13032578 · MATH4 · MATH120 · MATH111 · MATH117 · MATH150 · MATH151 · MATH137 · COLLEGEALGEBRA · MATH130 · MATH100 · MATH107 · 57 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Avoid unless you already know the material and can teach yourself; most students report a poor learning experience.

Best fit · Self Taught ProCannot explain conceptsBoard mistakes commonSelf-teach requiredNice but ineffectiveAvoid if weak at math
  • Many students say she does not teach and
  • Frequent board errors and
  • A minority of older reviews praise patience in lower-level math

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Passing often requires teaching yourself; homework and quizzes help some, but weak instruction makes an A costly.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Material becomes harder because and examples .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Multiple reviews note letter-grade drops for excess absences and .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Dominant student ; a small older minority disagrees.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

34/100

; limited partial credit and .

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Workload

Heavy

36/100

, and self-study load add up for many students.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

24/100

Repeated reports of , and frequent calculation mistakes.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of , and exams; some say tests exceed what class examples prepare.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Large body of in-person math reviews is mostly negative on teaching clarity, with and .

Main concern

and board mistakes leave students lost, especially without a strong math background.

What students said

“Judy is not a very good math teacher, she knows what she's talking about, but is not good at explaining concepts.”
MATH120
“ and goes straight to the hw section of each chapter WITHOUT TEACHING THE LESSON.”
MATH107
“She spends half the lecture correcting her mistakes on the board and the other half asking the class what she did wrong.”
MATH150

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams often feel harder than in-class examples; a .

Exams harder than practiceHomework-based test itemsIn-person exams

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as poorly aligned with and harder than practice.

Exams harder than examplesHW-related test itemsIn-person exams
“The in class problems do NOT prepare you for the exams.”
MATH150
“ . Tons of .”
137

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !!! ! She is unorganized, prone to mistakes, doesn't fully work out problems or skips a lot of steps.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 and avoid consensus. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

24/100

“She does not teach, she expects you to just know the material.”

👎 Recommendation

18/100

“ !!!”

🧠

32/100

“you just have to teach yourself everything”

📅

18/100

“ in excess of two”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • not good at explaining concepts
  • goes straight to the hw section WITHOUT TEACHING THE LESSON
  • all she does is copy stuff from the book

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Class examples do NOT prep you for the tests
  • tests you on things that

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • very very sweet lady but my goodness her teaching abilities were terrible
  • great human being... needs to actually teach

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

57

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews over many years with strong majority consensus that teaching quality is poor.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 52
3 out of 55
2 out of 512
1 out of 529

Course coverage

MATH10713 reviews
MATH1507 reviews
MATH1115 reviews
MATH1305 reviews
MATH1373 reviews
Show 11 more courses
MATH1603 reviews
1072 reviews
1372 reviews
MATH2 reviews
MATH42 reviews
COLLEGEALGEBRA1 review
MATH1001 review
MATH1171 review
MATH1201 review
MATH130325781 review
MATH1511 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1