AI Rate Professor

English

Lisette Davies Ward

ENGLISH111 · ENG111 · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
46/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if and verify recent term clarity; older reviews warn of chaos and harsh grading.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizing ReviewsUnclear ExpectationsEssay HeavyHarsh When StrictInspirational to Some
  • Student experiences and later organized, inspiring ones.
  • Many later students earned As by doing readings and essays; and busy work.
  • Attendance is often mandatory and class success hinges on .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Reported grades skew A when given, but many students say harsh or effort rather than .

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

44/100

Content is standard composition and literature with multiple essays; average difficulty sits mid-range with some calling it harder than expected.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

and emphasize showing up for organized lectures.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

About half call her a must-take inspirational teacher while the other and .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Later students call her a ; and unresponsive to clarification.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

34/100

Multiple essays, readings, and busy work are repeatedly mentioned as a heavy load for ENG111.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

Strong praise for claims of rambling and unclear instruction.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Success centers on essays, readings, and written work rather than heavily proctored exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person ENGLISH111/ENG111 is highly polarized: later cohorts praise organization and inspiring lectures, while , and busy work.

Main concern

Assignment clarity and .

What students said

“As long as you do the work, and the !”
ENGLISH111
“ . Tons of busy work and completely unfair grading scale.”
ENGLISH111
“ and .”
ENG111

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize essays and writing tools , so but under-specified.

Essay FocusedLimited Exam Detail

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

clear midterm or final exam rules.

Essay HeavyWriting Focused
“after writing 5 essays for her I left that class a stronger writer”
ENGLISH111
“ .”
ENG111

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I learned more from Professor Davies Ward than any other English Professor, ever! ... As long as you do the work, and the !”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 in-person reviews spanning 2012-2016, balancing later praise against earlier harsh critiques. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

52/100

“She's so so interesting and gives you really good hands on writing tools.”

⚠️ Clarity Risk

30/100

“ and how to even go about beginning them.”

📈 Grade Path

58/100

“As long as you do the work, and the !”

👎

20/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lectures on literary authors and movements are really interesting
  • She's so so interesting
  • She spends class time bumbling around, hoping to make a point

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Tons of busy work and
  • She grades unreasonably hard

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She's inspirational
  • nice lady, but
  • Whenever I needed

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Seventeen detailed in-person reviews span 2012-2016 with rich quotes, but strong year-to-year polarization lowers certainty for any single semester.

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 53
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ENG1119 reviews
ENGLISH1118 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

9

A 8 · A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values