AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Elizabeth Cunningham

MATH160 · MATH137138 · MATH150 · MATH107 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

Avoid if and flexible support; only take her if you can self-teach and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerStrict Notation GraderFast and DisorganizedLecture MistakesMandatory AttendanceHard Tests
  • Many , and
  • and notation with
  • Attendance is often mandatory and

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

, and several C or lower outcomes mean an A .

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Fast lectures, dense material, and content tough.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

as mandatory and warn that class presence is expected.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

A large share of and urge avoidance.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

24/100

Very picky about notation and calculation steps; partial credit helps some but many still struggle.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

34/100

Weekly homework, quizzes, and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Common complaints are speed, disorganization, lecture mistakes, and limited in-class help.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Homework is manageable, but and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person math classes are fast-paced and strict, with mixed but and organization.

Main concern

, and tests that .

What students said

“I would not reccomend her at all, she expects you to understand the material after 10 minutes of trying to cram in each lesson everyday”
MATH107
“she is so picky with everything and if your work is not perfect.”
MATH160
“Test averages was around 50-72 & she made MANY lecture mistakes.”
MATH150

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and often harder than homework, with low class averages reported.

Strict Calculation ProcedureNotation SensitiveHarder Than HomeworkIn-Person Tests

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and notation; averages around 50-72 are reported.

Strict Calculation ProcedureNotation SensitiveHarder Than Homework
“ , but she is really strict on calculation procedure.”
MATH160
“when it came to the criteria was not based on the ”
MATH150
“to get a good grade on the .”
MATH160

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is the reason I would want to change my major.”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 in-person , and student struggle themes. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

30/100

“She goes faster than you can write and ”

⚖️

24/100

“ .”

📉 Recommendation

28/100

“If .”

⏱️ Pace and Organization

25/100

“Likes to start new, very important topics with like 7 seconds left of class, every class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • All over the !
  • She is very disorganized, for the most part she knows her stuff but isn't ready for class.
  • half the .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • she is really strict on calculation procedure.
  • Test averages was around 50-72
  • the homework is pretty manageable but to get a good grade on the .

Theme 3

❤️ About Support and Effort

  • whenever you ask for help, she sends you to the tutoring center rather than help out
  • YOU are the one that needs to make the effort not HER.
  • . hours and email.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Fifteen detailed in-person reviews from 2014-2016 show strong thematic , and difficulty.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 52
3 out of 55
2 out of 54
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH1607 reviews
1072 reviews
MATH1072 reviews
311121 review
615881 review
Show 2 more courses
MATH1371381 review
MATH1501 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

2

B+ 2

C range

2

C 2

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1