AI Rate Professor

Graphic Arts

Jennie Jacobs

GDP110 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you can self-direct projects and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProInconsistent gradingUnclear assignmentsNice but unevenInteresting projectsHard to get help
  • Assignment quality and grades often feel mismatched
  • Some students love the projects while
  • Help-seeking can feel discouraged

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Some students earn A or A-, but grades .

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content difficulty is average; the .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

70/100

and others do not describe strict enforcement.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

40/100

One strong positive review is offset and grading.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

38/100

as weird and inconsistent, with stronger work sometimes scored lower.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Project-based work is central, but reviews do not describe an overwhelming volume of homework.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Students call her nice, yet several say she seems over her head and hard to get help from.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person GDP110 reviews split between interesting creative work and frustration with and .

Main concern

and help can feel unwelcome.

What students said

“Great teacher and !”
GDP110
“ if you need help with something.”
GDP110
“ .”
GDP110

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and do not clearly describe traditional exam policies.

Project-based assessment

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; exam format is not clearly described.

Project-based assessment
“ and receive a bad grade, then others would be so so and you would get the same grade or higher.”
GDP110

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“she was a nice teacher. learned a fair share from the class, but .”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person reviews, highlighting grading inconsistency and project work. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“Great teacher and !”

⚖️

38/100

“ .”

🆘 Help Access

30/100

“makes you feel stupid if you need help with something.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Nice teacher
  • Great teacher and
  • She seemed in over her head as a teacher

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Four reviews show a but the sample is small and somewhat polarized.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

GDP1104 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 1 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values