AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Luis Moreno

MATH41 · MATH000 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

High risk and highly polarizing—only consider if and possible harsh classroom treatment.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPolarizingRude in classHomework heavyHarsh personalityAvoid if possible
  • one calls him a great teacher who makes you learn, the other calls him the .
  • The negative review alleges public , and very slow problem-solving.
  • ; attendance was mandatory in at least one course; .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

No grade data and mixed reviews; A takes real effort.

All evidence is from 2 in-person reviews; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Difficulty ratings and comments span easy learning-focused homework to extremely hard, slow problem-solving classes.

All evidence is from 2 in-person reviews; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

; the other does not discuss flexibility.

All evidence is from 2 in-person reviews; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

One glowing learning-focused review is outweighed by a and humiliation.

All evidence is from 2 in-person reviews; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

; and a punitive classroom tone imply strict expectations.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

as hard and problem-solving as extremely slow and time-consuming.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Quality ratings average middling but comments swing .

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Comments emphasize homework and in-class .

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person math experiences range from hard-but-learning homework to reports of rudeness, public humiliation, and .

Main concern

Possible public shaming and very negative classroom climate for some students.

What students said

“ , but you will learn for sure!”
MATH000
“ !! , he does not care about anyone, does not like to teach, very rude!”
MATH41

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests and bad test experiences but .

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Tests are referenced as part of the experience, but proven.

In-class tests mentionedFormat not clearly described
“makes fun of you if you had a ”
MATH41

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews, highlighting extreme split opinions on teaching and classroom treatment. Credibility rating: Low.

⚠️ Polarizing Reputation

25/100

“ !! , he does not care about anyone, does not like to teach, very rude!”

📚

70/100

“ , but you will learn for sure!”

🧊 Classroom Climate Risk

15/100

“makes fun of you if you had a and will make you look stupid.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • , but you will learn for sure!
  • he does not like to teach, very rude!
  • It Takes one hour to solve one problem.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • makes fun of you if you had a
  • He will try .

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • does not care about anyone
  • Very bad person.
  • !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only 2 older reviews from 2015 with extreme disagreement and limited grade or .

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH0001 review
MATH411 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values