AI Rate Professor

Writing

Jose Maldonado

ENG110120 · ENG111 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
90/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you want an excellent, engaging writing professor and are willing to put .

Best fit · Effort For RewardGreat DiscussionsPassionate About LitHarsh GraderFun ClassMust-Take Writing
  • All three reviews give top quality scores and strong personal recommendations.
  • Discussions and listening skills make writing class engaging even for writing-averse students.
  • Expect ; it is not an Easy A despite high satisfaction.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

and students warn it is not an Easy A even when the class is fun.

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Weekly homework is simple and , but literature rigor and .

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Multiple reviews mark attendance mandatory for ENG111.

All evidence is in-person; two of three explicitly say mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

95/100

Every review is a , and fun learning despite tough grading.

All evidence is in-person; unanimous praise.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Essays are called fair by one student and surprisingly harsh by another; laziness is punished.

Format shift

All in-person evidence.

Workload

Light

72/100

as simple; main lift is putting full effort into essays.

Format shift

All in-person evidence.

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Students highlight listening, discussion design, humor, and passion that make writing class a favorite.

Format shift

All in-person evidence.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Core assessment is essays plus simple weekly homework and .

Format shift

All in-person evidence; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person ENG courses are praised as model teaching: discussion-driven, funny, fair but , and .

Main concern

an Easy A.

What students said

“Prof. Maldonado is the epitome of what a college professor should be.”
ENG111
“He is surprisingly a ! So don't be lazy”
ENG111
“One of the !”
ENG110120

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize essays and .

Essay FocusedDiscussion Based

Assessment risk

Standard

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Assessment centers on fairly-to-harshly graded essays and discussion-driven classwork; .

Essay FocusedDiscussion Driven
“ simple, and you will have fun learning!”
ENG111
“He is surprisingly a !”
ENG111

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Prof. Maldonado is the epitome of what a college professor should be.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews, highlighting excellent teaching and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🌟 Teaching Excellence

96/100

“One of the !”

📝

32/100

“He is surprisingly a ! So don't be lazy and give everything you turn into him your all”

💬 Discussion Magic

90/100

“He asks ”

❤️ Student Connection

92/100

“He's super funny and has a young soul so he really understands what it's like to be a student.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • the epitome of what a college professor should be
  • made the course so interesting that you want to participate
  • super funny and has a young soul

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • its not an easy A class at all

Theme 3

❤️ About Recommendation

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

52/100

Evidence confidence

Only 3 highly consistent 2015 reviews with strong detail, but the tiny sample limits certainty.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG1112 reviews
ENG1101201 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values