AI Rate Professor

Graphic Arts

Scott Nelson

MAT113 · MAT153 · MAT154 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if you want a .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyStudent Success FocusedClear InstructionsHighly CaringHelpful & ApproachableLight Spirited
  • Students say he and a peer are the and care deeply about success.
  • , and strong student interaction.
  • Intro web design can feel long, but paying attention and asking for help can earn an A.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

80/100

Students say an A is realistic if you pay attention, ask questions, and engage with help offered.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Intro web and MAT courses are described as approachable with low-to-moderate difficulty when instructions are followed.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

85/100

, and no comments describe strict attendance enforcement.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

92/100

Reviews call him among the , and highlight constant help and care.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

Students report you can earn an A with attention and help, despite one reported F grade.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Classes can run long and feel tedious, but workload is not described as overwhelming.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

93/100

Consistently praised for care, clarity, organization, fast support, and positive classroom energy.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Reviews emphasize class attention, questions, and help more than a .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students praise his care for , and light-spirited classroom presence in MAT courses.

Main concern

Some class sessions can feel long and tedious if you do not stay engaged.

What students said

“Out of all of the professors in the Mat and Gdp depts combined, he and Anna Kafferty are the best.”
MAT113
“ .His response to questions was amazingly fast.”
MAT153
“if you pay attention in class and ask for help, you can earn an A.”
MAT154

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a and help-based success.

Limited Exam Detail

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, or final format details.

Limited Exam Detail
“if you pay attention in class and ask for help, you can earn an A.”
MAT154

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Out of all of the professors in the Mat and Gdp depts combined, he and Anna Kafferty are the best. They care more about the success of a student than any other professor I have had.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews, highlighting care, clarity, and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

93/100

“I give him 10 stars, not 5.”

👍 Recommendation Strength

92/100

“he and Anna Kafferty are the best.”

🛟 Help & Support

90/100

“I found him(& Asst Marilyn) to be fun to work with and always there to help.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The class had a good sense of purpose.
  • .
  • He is funny (or tries to be) and is very light spirited.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • if you pay attention in class and ask for help, you can earn an A.
  • Course DIFFICULTY rating: 1
  • Don't be afrait to ask questions.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • They care more about the success of a student than any other professor I have had.
  • .
  • always there to help.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Only 3 older in-person reviews (2011-2015) with strong consistency but limited sample size and sparse grade data.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MAT1131 review
MAT1531 review
MAT1541 review

Reported outcomes

F results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values