AI Rate Professor

English

Sarah Faulkner

ENG1 · ENG110 · ENG111 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

Take her if you enjoy discussion-based English and will ; skip if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough essay graderSlow feedbackEngaging discussionsHeavy writing loadMixed engagement
  • Strong positive reviews for
  • , and little feedback
  • Workload and lecture energy vary widely by student

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

if you work, but and feedback is scarce.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Class content is approachable, yet writing volume and .

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews , so flexibility cannot be confirmed.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

Some call her one of the better English teachers, while others found her uncaring or overly demanding.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

42/100

Described as fair by some, but .

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Lots of , and reports of .

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Engaging and intelligent for some students, tedious or uncaring for others.

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Heavy emphasis on essays and .

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

writing, slow grading, and uneven lecture energy.

Main concern

and occasional heavy or tedious workload.

What students said

“She's a lot younger than others so she knows how to relate with her students by giving assignments on things we like such as Facebook, movies ..etc !! .”
ENG110
“I would consider her to be a . She never gave me anything higher than a B even when I thought it could definitely be an A paper.”
ENG111
“Gives a lot of writing assignments. . Doesn't give much (if so it can be difficult to improve.”
ENG111

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

One student noted an , but .

Easy finalEssay-heavy course

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as easy, while .

Easy finalEssay grading
“Overall, the class is easy and has an .Takeher.”
ENG111

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I was pleasantly surprised with my professor for English 110. She was engaging, interested and extremely intelligent. Her classes were interesting and she always allowed for a full class discussion.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 in-person reviews, , and workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

🗣️ Discussion Quality

72/100

“class discusions are interesting. and not professors like Menendez !!!”

📝

42/100

“I would consider her to be a . She never gave me anything higher than a B even when I thought it could definitely be an A paper.”

📦 Workload Pressure

35/100

“There is a lot of work and sometimes because she gets behind.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She was engaging, interested and extremely intelligent.
  • She didn't seem excited about teaching and class.
  • Complacent and uncaring. Spent most the time showing youtube videos.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • if you put the work in you will receive a good grade.

Theme 3

⏱️

  • . Doesn't give much (if so it can be difficult to improve.
  • a little slow with homework on time

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Seven mixed reviews from 2012-2013 give a consistent split between praise and complaints, but the sample is small and dated.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG1103 reviews
ENG1113 reviews
ENG11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values