AI Rate Professor

Earth & Planetary Sciences

Craig Scott

ENVS3438 · ERTH115 · EARTH132 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
96/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if you want an engaging, clear Earth or environmental science professor who makes geology exciting.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyEnthusiastic GeologistCrystal Clear LecturesReal Field VideosHelpful Note GuidesInspiring Scientist
  • All three reviews rate him a perfect 5 for .
  • , and real volcanology field clips.
  • Assessments include start-of-class quizzes, weekly article summaries, and three non-cumulative midterms.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Difficulty is moderate-low and students love the structure, but quizzes and grade.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

and videos, and reported difficulty stays manageable for most.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

40/100

A quiz at the start of each class strongly implies that skipping hurts.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

Every review is a strong endorsement, including students who want more of his classes.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

70/100

No harsh-grader complaints; and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Weekly article summaries, frequent quizzes, and but not crushing.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

95/100

Students praise clarity, humor, enthusiasm, field videos, and note handouts that make lectures stick.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Quizzes and as supporting work.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person Earth and , and well supported with notes, videos, and structured quizzes plus midterms.

Main concern

Expect and , so attendance and weekly work still matter.

What students said

“ so far.”
ENVS3438
“Very enthusiastic...he is a volconologist so he has lots of real clips of his field studies.”
EARTH132
“ ; weekly article summary; three mid-terms (not cumlative).”
ERTH115

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessments are structured around quizzes and , but not described as .

Start-of-Class QuizzesThree Non-Cumulative MidtermsWeekly Article SummariesLecture Notes Handed Out

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person sections use start-of-class quizzes, weekly article summaries, and three non-cumulative midterms.

In-Class QuizzesThree MidtermsHanded-Out Notes
“ ; weekly article summary; three mid-terms (not cumlative).”
ERTH115
“He hands out note guidelines before each chapter and .”
EARTH132

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ so far. Gonna register for some more ENVS but I can't find u!”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person Earth science reviews, highlighting clarity, enthusiasm, and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

95/100

“Craig is an awesome teacher. Very enthusiastic...he is a volconologist so he has lots of real clips of his field studies.”

📚

90/100

“He hands out note guidelines before each chapter and .”

📝 Assessment Pattern

58/100

“ ; weekly article summary; three mid-terms (not cumlative).”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures were interesting; used slides and videos.
  • Good sense of humor.
  • Professor was very helpful; answered questions clearly.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • ; weekly article summary; three mid-terms (not cumlative).
  • Because of him, I now am interested in furthering my geologic studies

Theme 3

❤️ About Impact

  • so far.
  • I now am interested in furthering my geologic studies...Thanks Craig

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

Only three glowing in-person reviews exist from 2008-2012, so consistency is high but sample size is thin.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

EARTH1321 review
ENVS34381 review
ERTH1151 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values