AI Rate Professor

Business

Katrina Carl

BUS101 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.8

The decision

Avoid unless you have no other option; most students report a terrible teaching and classroom experience.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerBoring LecturerHarsh AttitudeHeavy WorkloadFast PacedAvoid
  • Most students call lectures boring PowerPoint reading with little real teaching.
  • Class is rigorous with daily quizzes, papers, and a .
  • Multiple reviews cite unfair treatment and a bad attitude toward students.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Daily quizzes, papers, a group project, and a .

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

Students describe the class as extremely rigorous, fast paced, and work intensive.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

, though one student stressed never missing class.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Three of four reviews strongly .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Students report unfair treatment and a tough, high-pressure course setup.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Typical load , and a comprehensive final.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

24/100

Most students say she reads slides, lectures poorly, and brings a bad classroom attitude.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and a comprehensive final.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person BUS101 felt rigorous and poorly taught, with , and unfair treatment for many students.

Main concern

Harsh attitude, weak lecturing, and heavy daily workload.

What students said

“TERRIBLE!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!”
BUS101
“The teacher was boring and lacked the ability to properly lecture, she read from the .”
BUS101
“She had a bad attitude and singled out students and treated them unfairly.”
BUS101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention a and frequent quizzes but .

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and frequent quizzes; proctoring style is not clearly described.

Comprehensive FinalDaily Quizzes
“The so READ THE TEXT BOOK and you will pass this class!”
BUS101
“There will be a quiz every day typically, 3 papers and a .”
BUS101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“TERRIBLE!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person reviews, highlighting teaching quality, workload, and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫

18/100

“ ”

📉 Teaching Quality

24/100

“The teacher was boring and lacked the ability to properly lecture, she read from the .”

⚡ Heavy Workload

25/100

“There will be a quiz every day typically, 3 papers and a .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she read from the
  • lacked the ability to properly lecture
  • Katrina is awesome. She is extremely well versed in what she is talking about.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Workload

  • This class was extremely rigorous and fast paced.
  • There will be a quiz every day typically, 3 papers and a .
  • The class is very work intensive

Theme 3

😠 About Classroom Climate

  • She had a bad attitude and singled out students and treated them unfairly.
  • TERRIBLE!!!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Only four old reviews from 2009-2010 with mixed detail, but opinions are mostly consistent on poor teaching.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

BUS1014 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values