AI Rate Professor

English

Steve Cook

ENG111 · ENG110 · ENG110120 · ENGL110 · ENGSECT · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
62/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you want to improve as a writer and are ready to work hard; skip him if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardChallenging WritingGreat DiscussionsInconsistent ClarityHigh ExpectationsRewarding If You Work
  • Many students praise his humor, discussions, and real growth in writing.
  • The class can be tough with , and high standards.
  • Some students find expectations unclear or his style inconsistent.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

36/100

An A , and meeting high writing standards, not light effort.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

Students call the course challenging with , and demanding writing work.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

and growth despite the challenge and occasional confusion.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

He rewards real effort and improvement, but slackers and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Expect , and sometimes workbook or research paper work.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

68/100

Many find him funny, insightful, and motivating, though .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

, and writing work rather than pure exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person English students split between loving his challenging, discussion-heavy style and .

Main concern

and .

What students said

“Mr. Cook is by far the .”
ENG111
“Very inconsistent. Confusing. Not helpful.”
ENG111
“this class was very challenging & if you plan on taking it in the summer be prepared to not go out much and spend your time reading 100 pages a night.”
ENG110

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize essays and writing tasks more than proctored exams, with .

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and writing standards rather than formal exam proctoring.

Essay HeavyResearch Paper PossibleHigh Writing Standards
“he does. He will make you fo the english 120 workbook.”
ENGL110
“Overall do the and you will be rewarded.”
ENG110

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Mr. Cook is by far the . His style is unique and interesting.”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 in-person reviews, highlighting growth, challenge, and mixed clarity. Credibility rating: High.

✍️ Teaching Impact

68/100

“By the end of the semester he will have you writing so well you could imagine becoming an author.”

📚 Course Challenge

34/100

“This was a VERY challenging class in which one's English skills are definitely put to the test.”

🤔 Clarity Concerns

40/100

“Very inconsistent. Confusing. Not helpful. Very difficult to understand what he wants us to grasp from the class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Really funny and interesting.
  • always willing to help and is diplomatic

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • pretty high expectations
  • if you're a slacker.
  • spend your time reading 100 pages a night

Theme 3

🧭 About Clarity & Fit

  • I never knew what the guy wanted the entire semester
  • If you are serious about your education and are willing to do the work, you will enjoy this class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

80/100

Evidence confidence

Thirteen reviews spanning 2005-2010 with mixed but detailed opinions on teaching style and workload.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 54
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG1106 reviews
ENG1114 reviews
ENG1101201 review
ENGL1101 review
ENGSECT1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not_Sure_Yet 2