AI Rate Professor

Graphic Arts

Jill Katz

MAT113 · MAT216 · MAT154 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.9

The decision

Great for beginners who want a fun design teacher; skip if you already know the material.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyFun TeacherBeginner FriendlyWeb DesignEntertainingSlow Pace
  • Most , and .
  • Beginners like the slow pace; advanced students may find it too slow or repetitive.
  • One sharp negative review calls Web Design II a complete waste of time.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

80/100

Difficulty ratings skew low and comments stress a cool, easy-feeling class for beginners.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Pace is slow and beginner-focused, though one advanced section felt like pure review.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

reviews.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

Most students would take her again, with .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

75/100

Low difficulty scores and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

72/100

Students emphasize fun snippets and class flow more than heavy projects.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

80/100

Described as , and entertaining about web design.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Comments focus on design practice and class demos rather than exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Fun, friendly design instructor who works well for beginners, with some criticism of slow or repetitive advanced sections.

Main concern

Experienced students may find Web Design II too slow or redundant.

What students said

“ .”
MAT154
“If you are a real beginner, it's good.”
MAT113
“complete waste of ”
MAT154

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews ; course focus appears project-based.

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 in-person reviews, balancing strong praise with one advanced-class critique. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

80/100

“ , and engaging.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

78/100

“ .”

🐢 Beginner Pace

72/100

“If you are a real beginner, it's good.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Fun and entertaining banter about Web design
  • great teacher, friendly and helpful
  • COOL CLASS COOL TEACHER

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • class moves very slowly
  • If you are a real beginner, it's good
  • the entire class is a review of previous design classes

Theme 3

⚠️

  • complete waste of
  • Could have used a little more individual help

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

60/100

Evidence confidence

Eight mostly consistent in-person reviews from 2006-2010, with .

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MAT1546 reviews
MAT1131 review
MAT2161 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values