AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Evan McCabe

NURS · N128 · PHARMO2IIAS · NURS161 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Take her for nursing lecture or clinical if you want a .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyPatient Clinical InstructorPersonable and ApproachableAdds Beyond PowerPointNo EgoCritical Care Knowledgeable
  • Nursing students praise her as personable, patient, and strong in both classroom and clinical.
  • She expands on material instead of reading slides and avoids ego-driven teaching.
  • Difficulty is moderate; care and clarity are the main draws.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

No free-A claims; students emphasize learning support and moderate difficulty, so solid grades still need engagement.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Nursing content with mid-range difficulty ratings feels standard rather than fluff or brutal theory.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

nursing and clinical expectations.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Reviews consistently call her a great teacher and strong clinical instructor without real pushback.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

66/100

; tone is supportive and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Difficulty sits around average for nursing courses with .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Students praise her personable style, clinical patience, and habit of teaching beyond the PowerPoint.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Comments emphasize lecture quality and clinical teaching more than a .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person nursing and and content-rich; , and stronger than slide-reading instructors.

Main concern

Moderate difficulty with .

What students said

“She's very personable, approachable, fun, interesting- a great teacher!”
NURS161
“She really cares about her students. Great teacher. Adds so .”
N128
“Great clinical instructor. Very patient and calm.”
NURS

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews highlight clinical instruction and understanding rather than strict proctoring or open-book policies.

Clinical Evaluation Focus

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and content mastery without detailing proctored exam rules.

Clinical FocusPatient Instruction
“ . No ego or weird power trips.”
PHARMO2IIAS
“Great clinical instructor. Very patient and calm.”
NURS

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She really cares about her students. Great teacher. Adds so .”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person nursing reviews, highlighting clinical patience and lecture quality. Credibility rating: Low.

🌟 Teaching Quality

90/100

“She's very personable, approachable, fun, interesting- a great teacher!”

🏥 Clinical Strength

88/100

“Great clinical instructor. Very patient and calm.”

🧠 Knowledge & Support

86/100

“She wants you to get it and spends the time to make sure you do.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Adds so
  • adds info instead of

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • really cares about her students
  • No ego or weird power trips

Theme 3

📚 About Expertise

  • Very knowledgeable about critical care nursing.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

40/100

Evidence confidence

Only 4 consistent positive in-person reviews with useful teaching detail, but small sample and little grade data.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

N1281 review
NURS1 review
NURS1611 review
PHARMO2IIAS1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values