AI Rate Professor

Art History

Beverly Decker

ART140 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.0

The decision

Avoid if you want meaningful art instruction; only consider if you just need a light, undemanding class.

Best fit · Easy A HunterVague instructionsPointless busy workLow intellectual challengeUninspiring assignments
  • Single review calls her vague with .
  • Course felt like third-grade busy work rather than college-level art.
  • Very low quality rating despite low reported difficulty.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Difficulty is rated very low and the work is described as third-grade busy work, so grades likely require little real effort.

All evidence is from the single in-person review; .

Is the course easy?

Introductory

88/100

Student compared the class to third-grade art busy work with minimal challenge.

All evidence is from the single in-person review; .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The sole .

All evidence is from the single in-person review; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

The only review gives low quality and frames the class as vague and pointless.

All evidence is from the single in-person review; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

No grade outcomes are described; only that assignments felt pointless.

Format shift

All evidence is from the single in-person review.

Workload

Light

75/100

Described as busy work rather than demanding college-level projects.

Format shift

All evidence is from the single in-person review.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Teaching called vague with assignments that seemed pointless.

Format shift

All evidence is from the single in-person review.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Review .

Format shift

All evidence is from the single in-person review.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

One in-person ART140 review describes vague teaching and .

Main concern

and poorly explained.

What students said

“the she was vague and the . i felt as if I was back in 3rd grade art class - busy work.”
ART140

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

review.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“i felt as if I was back in 3rd grade art class - busy work.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review with limited detail. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“the she was vague and the .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

22/100

“i felt as if I was back in 3rd grade art class - busy work.”

📘 Course Challenge

88/100

“ . i felt as if I was back in 3rd grade art class - busy work.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she was vague

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • back in 3rd grade art class - busy work

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

18/100

Evidence confidence

Only one old, short review with no corroborating comments or grade detail.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ART1401 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values