AI Rate Professor

History

Ronald Parsons

HIST110 · HIST102 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
93/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you want a and are ready to write a lot of essays.

Best fit · Effort For RewardUnderstandingEssay HeavyWell StructuredLively DiscussionsResponsive
  • All three reviews give him a perfect 5 for teaching quality.
  • Assignments and ; he is flexible when life events hit.
  • Expect lots of essays and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Students say reading the book and doing the material yields a good grade, but .

; no online reviews were analyzed.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Difficulty sits around medium with reading-heavy history content and multiple essays.

; no online reviews were analyzed.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Attendance policy is not detailed; flexibility shows up more as .

; no online reviews were analyzed.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

Every reviewer loves him and one says they would dearly love more classes with him.

; no online reviews were analyzed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Clear expectations plus willingness to .

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

Multiple essays and an but structured load.

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

Students highlight lively discussions, clear directions, structure, and genuine care.

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Essays and online or reading-based materials dominate; finals are also essay-based.

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

History students praise , and structured work that rewards reading and writing.

Main concern

.

What students said

“Prof Parsons is an amazing teacher. He always had lively and informative discussions in class, and and well stated.”
HIST110
“Good instructor, Lots of essays. .”
HIST102
“Very well structured, he is .”
HIST102

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment leans on essays, including a .

Essay FinalLots of EssaysReading Based

Assessment risk

Standard

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and many essays without stating open-book or proctoring rules.

Essay FinalLots of Essays
“ . Discussions were fun due to classmates. Just lots of essays.”
HIST102
“You read the book and do the online material you get a good grade plain and simple.”
HIST102

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 highly positive in-person reviews focused on care, structure, and essay load. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

92/100

“Prof Parsons is an amazing teacher. He always had lively and informative discussions in class”

📝 Essay Load

42/100

“Good instructor, Lots of essays. .”

❤️ Student Care

88/100

“When I had death in the family, he gave me an .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and well stated.
  • Very well structured, he is .
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Workload and Grades

  • Just lots of essays.
  • You read the book and do the online material you get a good grade plain and simple.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

Only three but limited sample size and older dates reduce confidence.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

HIST1022 reviews
HIST1101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values