AI Rate Professor

Film Studies

Lucia Ricciardelli-Silber

FLMST101 · FS101 · FILM101 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Avoid unless and can self-motivate through dull lectures.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerBoring LecturesHarsh GraderTextbook-HeavyApproachable but Tough
  • Lectures often called boring, long, and textbook-copied
  • and low test scores
  • Mixed personal warmth but overall recommendation is weak

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

Students report , and midterm scores around 60% despite long study time.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Lots of reading, textbook-driven work, and above-average difficulty ratings make the content harder than a typical GE film class.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

75/100

One student skipped regularly and still passed tests by watching .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Most comments warn not to waste time, citing boring lectures and .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

25/100

Comments describe ridiculous grading and a 60% midterm after heavy studying.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Lots of reading, textbook-centered work, and multi-hour study for exams are repeatedly mentioned.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Students find her nice but lectures boring, , and largely copied from the book.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

70/100

Midterms, tests, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

some praise passion and help, most criticize boring lectures, high GE bar, and .

Main concern

Boring long lectures and .

What students said

“I never went to class because I fell asleep everyday.”
FLMST101
“Lectures are super boring and are basically copied word for word from the textbook.”
FILM101
“I spent 3 hours making notecards and studying for the midterm and got a 60%!!!”
FILM101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Students report and feel out of line with GE expectations.

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and hard; one student studied 3 hours with notecards and still scored 60%.

In-Person MidtermHard Grading
“I spent 3 hours making notecards and studying for the midterm and got a 60%!!!”
FILM101
“I watched the movies at home and bsd the tests.”
FLMST101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“please, dont EVEN WASTE YOUR TIME! and whatever but ”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person reviews, highlighting lecture quality and . Credibility rating: Medium.

😴 Lecture Quality

25/100

“Lectures are super boring and are basically copied word for word from the textbook.”

📉

25/100

“I spent 3 hours making notecards and studying for the midterm and got a 60%!!!”

🚫 Recommendation

28/100

“please, dont EVEN WASTE YOUR TIME! and whatever but ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • This teacher was hard to understand and boring
  • Lectures are super boring and are basically copied word for word from the textbook
  • Has a strong Italian accent, but she tries to be understandable

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • her expectations for a general ed class are extraordinarily high
  • I spent 3 hours making notecards and studying for the midterm and got a 60%!!!
  • Lots of reading. Most of the coursework is from the book

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She is a great person yet her expectations for a general ed class are extraordinarily high
  • She's very willing to help, and is very sympathetic
  • Nice. Sweet.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Four consistent 2008-2009 reviews with shared themes on boring lectures and , but all are old.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

FILM1012 reviews
FLMST1011 review
FS1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values