AI Rate Professor

Geography

Amber Wittner

GIST53 · GIST54 · GIST52 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
7/100
RMP rating
1.1/5
Take again
18.18%
Difficulty
4.1

The decision

Avoid unless the course is required and you , and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganizedLate GradingHeavy WorkloadOutdated MaterialsPoor Support
  • Students overwhelmingly describe the courses as , and poorly supported.
  • unsure of their standing.
  • Some students still earn A grades, but the experience is stressful and time-heavy.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

A grades appear possible, but students , and unclear assignments that make the A costly.

Most evidence is online, while the and poor teaching.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The difficulty comes less from clean intellectual challenge and , and unclear instructions.

Online reviews emphasize broken Canvas materials and , while and busy work.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews do not clearly establish a , though one in-person review mentions canceled lectures.

Online evidence does not discuss attendance, and clear policy.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

because they feel unsupported, overworked, and poorly taught.

Both online and in-person comments are negative, with online evidence being much larger and more detailed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

24/100

Students report , and grades posted too late to correct problems.

Format shift

Online reviews repeatedly mention late grading and , while .

Workload

Overwhelming

12/100

Students describe , and long busy-work assignments.

Format shift

Online reviews provide the strongest workload evidence, and and busy work.

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

Comments repeatedly describe the instruction as , and lacking meaningful teaching.

Format shift

Online reviews focus on broken course design and poor communication, while and videos.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessment , and exams rather than relying on one method.

Format shift

Online reviews mention labs, discussions, quizzes, midterms, finals, and projects, while and ESRI tutorials.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are also negative, with students calling the class mostly recycled readings, videos, and busy work.

Main concern

Students report little meaningful teaching and a large amount of old or recycled work.

What students said

“They don't actually teach anything in a meaningful way, just make the students do a lot of reading and watching YouTube videos.”
GIST53
“One of our labs was something like 70 pages.”
GIST54

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are strongly negative, , and weak instructor support.

Main concern

Students say online courses require too much self-teaching because grading and guidance arrive too late.

What students said

“Genuinely the .”
GIST53
“ , and information that needs to be updated.”
GIST52
“25+ hours of reading, discussion, quizzes, and , but profs do .”
GIST52

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is limited, but reviews mention quiz, midterm, and labs.

QuizzesMidtermFinalTextbook-Based Questions

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book rules, or final structure.

Online

Online reviews mention quizzes, midterm, and final questions, but .

QuizzesMidtermFinalTextbook-Based Questions
“Her quiz questions are basically ripped from either the .”
GIST52
“ and lectures.”
GIST54

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you have to take their class, just mentally prepare for the terrible experience it will inevitably be.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

10/100

“They have no idea how to teach.”

📚 Workload Pressure

12/100

“25+ hours of reading, discussion, quizzes, and , but profs do .”

⚖️

24/100

“There was little .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • They don't actually teach anything in a meaningful way, just make the students do a lot of reading and watching YouTube videos.
  • Unprofessional, ill-prepared, and disorganized.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • Greatly underestimate the time to complete the assigned work in 1 week.
  • One of our labs was something like 70 pages.

Theme 3

🧾

  • Professors do not grade assignments promptly, making it impossible to know if you have gaps in your knowledge or if your grade is in trouble before it's too late.
  • and discussions until the last few weeks of the quarter.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven reviews across several years are highly consistent and , and course organization.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 510

Course coverage

GIST524 reviews
GIST534 reviews
GIST543 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

6

A 5 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values