AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Nadia Biglari

CHEM25 · 18 lifetime ratings

AI rating
30/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
31.58%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Avoid if foundation.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized examsTough gradingKind but inconsistentWeak foundationsExtra credit helps
  • Most negative reviews say exams are misleading, error-prone, or not aligned with class material.
  • Several students describe her as kind, funny, and approachable, but that does not offset repeated teaching and .
  • Grades can be saved by or lenient labs, but the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Getting an A is possible with or lenient labs, but and can dominate the grade.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Students often say the chemistry content itself is manageable, but disorganization and .

All course difficulty evidence comes from in-person CHEM25 reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews do not clearly describe a , though labs and in-class structure appear important.

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

Most students recommend avoiding her because teaching gaps, grading delays, and .

All , and the dominant tone is negative despite a few strong positives.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Students repeatedly report tough or , and high-stakes exams.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Homework, labs, lectures, and students say does not help exam performance.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Positive comments praise her personality, but many students say and does not teach chemistry clearly.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

85/100

Reviews describe a and the .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are sharply split, but the dominant pattern , and .

Main concern

, or study materials.

What students said

“ and look nothing like the practice tests.”
CHEM25
“There are two exams worth 150 points each, and if you don't do well on one, there's no coming back.”
CHEM25
“ and .”
CHEM25

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

or practice material, and one review explicitly says notes are not allowed.

Test HeavyNo Notes On TestsPractice Tests Do Not MatchHigh-Stakes Exams

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and one explicit no-notes policy.

No Notes On TestsHigh-Stakes MidtermHigh-Stakes FinalMisaligned Practice Tests
“You can't bring notes on tests, and one.”
CHEM25
“ and look nothing like the practice tests.”
CHEM25

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You are truly on your own here.”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, exams, and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“For CHEM 1A. Nadia is lovely but she doesn't know how to teach.”

⚖️

25/100

“There are two exams worth 150 points each, and if you don't do well on one, there's no coming back.”

👍 Recommendation Level

30/100

“ if you want to actually learn chem.”

Theme 1

🧪 About Exams

  • and look nothing like the practice tests.
  • The as the practice or completely different; it's a gamble.
  • You can't bring notes on tests, and one.

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and made many mistakes in her own lecture handout and .
  • and .
  • This .

Theme 3

📈 About Grades And Work

  • She does offer a good amount of opportunities, so you'll be able to pass.
  • and her teaching style isn't for everyone.
  • She grades the labs leniently and is understanding if you ask for extensions.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

18

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

and consistent evidence, though the extreme split between praise and criticism reduces certainty slightly.

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 53
1 out of 59

Course coverage

CHEM2519 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

18 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

12

Not sure yet 5 · Rather not say 7