AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Young Hee Park Lee

CALC1C · CALC1A · MATH2A · MATH250 · 1D · 2A · CALC1D · MATH1D · 268 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
29.24%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

unless you are very strong at math, comfortable self-teaching, and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProHarsh gradingTest heavySelf-study requiredUnclear lecturesLow partial credit
  • Most students warn that grades .
  • Many and require heavy self-teaching before class.
  • A minority of students praise her rigor and care, but the dominant experience is stressful and grade-risky.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

An A is very hard because , and many students say one bad test can sink the grade.

Both formats report harsh grading, with controlling the grade.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

16/100

The math content is concept-heavy and becomes harder because many students find the and .

Online reviews emphasize outside resources and pre-reading, while and .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Some reviews describe mandatory or required lectures and pre-class reading, but .

Online evidence mentions mandatory lectures and required pre-class reading; strict attendance.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

24/100

because the , and harshly graded.

Both formats lean negative, with a small number of positive reviews in each format praising rigor and support.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

10/100

Students repeatedly report little or , and very strict standards.

Format shift

Both formats describe harsh grading, especially in-person reviews about learning checks, finals, and no partial credit.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

The workload is heavy because students must pre-read, self-study, and prepare for difficult exams with limited guidance.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize pre-class reading and outside resources, while and .

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

A few students praise her care and rigor, but , and weak support.

Format shift

Both formats include a small positive minority, but teaching clarity.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

95/100

Reviews consistently say , and the final.

Format shift

Both online and in-person reviews describe the class as exam focused, with .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

43 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are strongly negative overall, , and limited partial credit.

Main concern

The main risk is a .

What students said

“The whole .”
CALC1C
“ , and no partial credit is given.”
1D
“1 bad test and your grade tanks.”
CALC1A

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews mostly describe harsh grading, difficult exams, required pre-class learning, and .

Main concern

Online students report high stress and needing outside resources to learn the material.

What students said

“Had to look up outside sources to actually learn the material.”
2A
“Pre-class reading is required, and she only goes through annotated notes during class.”
1D
“she also gives no partial credit, just an aweful experience overall.”
CALC1C

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and commonly graded with little partial credit or .

Test HeavyNo Partial CreditFinal Replaces GradesLearning ChecksLimited Feedback

Assessment risk

Strict

15/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and finals as high-stakes assessments with little partial credit and .

Whole Grade Based On TestsNo Partial CreditFinal Replaces GradesLearning Checks
“The whole .”
CALC1C
“She says she gives partial credit, but actually doesn't.”
1D
“learning checks are basically exams worth 60% of grade.”
MATH1D

Online

Online reviews describe quizzes and tests as the main grades with no partial credit or useful feedback; reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, .

No Partial CreditTest HeavyLimited Feedback
“only grades quizes and tests”
CALC1C
“ '?'”
2A
“she also gives no partial credit”
CALC1C

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you really want an A). Lectures are unhelpful, she just clicks through the steps of problems and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and student stress. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

30/100

“The lectures are bad, you will only understand what's going on if you pre-learned prior to class, defeating the purpose of attending lectures to learn.”

⚖️

10/100

“Even if the answer is correct, if you don't "demonstrate deep understanding of the concept," you won't get any credit.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

24/100

“ if you want an A.”

Theme 1

🧮 About Exams and Grades

  • The whole .
  • The grade with this professor(90% of it, exactly).
  • Every point you get will be exactly 1% in the cumulative, she don't do curves and expect .

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She expects students to already know everything, and when you need help, she dismisses your questions with vague answers.
  • Lectures are unhelpful, she just clicks through the steps of problems and .
  • It's hard to understand and follow along lectures.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Experience

  • .
  • To anyone who is taking her in the future, good luck. You're gonna need it. A lot.
  • There were quite a few times where I considered dropping the course.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

268

Lifetime ratings

93/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is highly credible because it draws from 50 recent and detailed reviews with , and lecture clarity.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 573
4 out of 529
3 out of 525
2 out of 527
1 out of 5115

Course coverage

1D23 reviews
CALC1C11 reviews
2A8 reviews
CALC1D2 reviews
MATH1D2 reviews
Show 3 more courses
MATH2A2 reviews
CALC1A1 review
MATH2501 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

47 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 2 · A 5 · A- 1

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

7

C+ 1 · C 5 · C- 1

D range

7

D+ 3 · D 2 · D- 2

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

20

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 11 · Rather not say 5