AI Rate Professor

Foothill College · Anthropology

Julie Jenkins

ANTH1 · ANTH2AH · ANTH2A · GLST · 36 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
61.11%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Take Jenkins if you like anthropology and can handle rubric-focused writing, but if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardKind but polarizingHarsh grading concernsManageable weekly workCommunication issuesInteresting content
  • Many students find the class easy and organized, especially online, but .
  • Positive reviews praise Jenkins as caring, engaging, and accommodating when students communicate early.
  • Negative reviews repeatedly , and grade uncertainty.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

66/100

Many students earn A grades from manageable weekly work, but and low difficulty suggests.

Online evidence shows easier late work and weekly assignments, while in-person evidence has .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The course content is usually described as easy or manageable, with reading, videos, discussions, and writing .

Both formats describe the class as easy, though in-person students more often separate easy content from difficult professor interactions.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

62/100

, but in-person reviews mention participation and lecture attendance as useful while online work is more self-paced.

Online flexibility is stronger through extensions and late passes, while and communication mattering.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

57/100

and organized, but the and communication complaints make the recommendation conditional.

Online reviews are more often positive overall, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

Grades can be generous on routine work, but many students , and .

Format shift

Online reviews include both full-credit and harsh-grading reports, while .

Workload

Moderate

64/100

Weekly readings, annotations, discussions, videos, and occasional projects are usually manageable but can feel tedious.

Format shift

Online workload is repetitive and module-based, while as manageable with reading and projects.

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

Her teaching is praised as caring and engaging by many students, but communication failures and .

Format shift

Online teaching is often organized but criticized for , while and stronger personal criticism.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Assessment , and occasional quizzes rather than exams.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize weekly assignments and projects, while , and few quizzes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

teaching and complaints about subjective grading or unprofessional communication.

Main concern

and communication.

What students said

“She has a lecture style that engages the whole class.”
ANTH2A
“grades are based on her feelings and not on the rubric.”
ANTH2A
“Lectures are always interesting and fun.”
ANTH2AH

Remote format

Online

24 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mostly positive about easy weekly work and flexibility, but , and delayed communication.

Main concern

Online students may , and picky deductions.

What students said

“Super easy class, can turn in assignments late and still receive full credit”
ANTH2AH
“ show up to office hours on time”
ANTH2A
“She's very picky about what you write sometimes, so she will deduct lots of points.”
ANTH1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews point mostly to assignment-based grading with few or no tests, and they do .

Few Or No TestsProjects And AssignmentsOccasional QuizzesNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and not many quizzes, but do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or closed-book rules.

Assignments And DiscussionsNot Many QuizzesNo Clear Exam Policy Evidence
“ and assignments. ”
ANTH2AH
“Just 1 extra project towards the end of the quarter.”
ANTH2AH

Online

Online reviews repeatedly mention no tests, few quizzes, final projects, and , Lockdown Browser, or strict proctoring.

No Tests Or Quizzes In Some SectionsTwo Quizzes In Some SectionsFinal ProjectNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“ !!”
GLST
“ ”
ANTH2A
“Also has 3 late passes 1 final project 100 pts.”
ANTH2A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Super easy class, but seriously, this teacher is SO HARD to communicate with, breaks her promises, and grades are based on her feelings and not on the rubric.”

Voice snapshots generated from 36 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and communication. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

62/100

“I like her!!! She has a lecture style that engages the whole class.”

⚖️

45/100

“There are a reasonable amount of assignments, but she's a .”

👍 Recommendation Level

57/100

“Take her class was the ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She has a lecture style that engages the whole class.
  • Lectures are always interesting and fun.
  • Professor Jenkins was super nice!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • Super easy class, can turn in assignments late and still receive full credit
  • She's very picky about what you write sometimes, so she will deduct lots of points.
  • Super easy class, but seriously, this teacher is SO HARD to communicate with

Theme 3

💬 About Communication

  • show up to office hours on time
  • Just attend lectures and communicate with her.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

36

Recent reviews read by the AI

36

Lifetime ratings

91/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is based on 36 recent reviews across online and , workload, and communication.

Inside 36 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 519
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 54
1 out of 510

Course coverage

ANTH2A18 reviews
ANTH110 reviews
ANTH2AH7 reviews
GLST1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

31 reported outcomes

A range

20

A+ 5 · A 12 · A- 3

B range

5

B+ 3 · B 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 2