Is this an easy A?
HardWork
38/100Good grades are possible, but many students report , and needing strong self-direction to earn them.
Online has some easy GID33 evidence, while and .
A15 · ART15A · ARTF004E · GID037 · ART4A · GID37 · ART4E · GID33 · GID41 · F004E01 · GID031 · 30 lifetime ratings
The decision
Key questions
Is this an easy A?
Good grades are possible, but many students report tough grading, late feedback, and needing strong self-direction to earn them.
Online has some easy GID33 evidence, while in-person art courses more often describe hard work and tough grading.
Is the course easy?
The content is not always conceptually advanced, but unclear instruction and limited feedback make the courses harder than they should be.
Online difficulty often comes from poor communication, while in-person difficulty comes from high art expectations and critique standards.
Is attendance flexible?
Several reviews mention participation matters or needing to show up, and one review says skipping class means you will not pass.
Online reviews imply participation through assignments, while in-person reviews more clearly connect attendance with passing.
Is this professor recommended?
Recommendation is low because many students describe weak instruction, poor feedback timing, and frustrating communication.
Online reviews lean more negative, while in-person reviews are mixed with strong older praise and strong recent criticism.
Course guide
Grading
Strict
31/100
Students frequently call him a tough grader, though some A grades appear when students complete strong work.
Format shift
Online grading complaints focus on unclear grade status and late feedback, while in-person reviews emphasize tough grading standards.
Workload
Heavy
29/100
Workload can spike sharply, with several reviews citing many assignments, homework, and time-consuming art submissions.
Format shift
Online workload is described as uneven, while in-person art courses often require sustained practice and projects.
Teaching experience
Poor
35/100
His teaching record is inconsistent, with many recent reviews saying instruction and feedback are missing despite older praise for expertise.
Format shift
Online teaching is criticized for low interaction, while in-person teaching ranges from excellent older critique to poor recent guidance.
Assessment method
FocusOnAssignments
18/100
Reviews describe projects, homework, critiques, and design or drawing assignments far more than tests.
Format shift
Both formats are mainly assignment-based, with online GID33 explicitly reporting no tests.
Luni fit check
Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.
Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.
Course format
Classroom format
High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner
In-person reviews are split between strong older praise for feedback and expertise and newer complaints about rare instruction and tough grading.
Main concern
The main risk is inconsistent teaching quality and unclear expectations.
What students said
“no lectures, no critique, no guidance, and he expects disney-like submits!”
“Amazing lectures, he's funny, gives objective feedback on your work.”
“Have to work hard for grade and he is a little perfectionist.”
Remote format
High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro
Online reviews are mostly negative, citing poor communication, late grading, limited instructor-made instruction, and uneven workload.
Main concern
Students often cannot get timely feedback or replies when they need help.
What students said
“Online class with no real instruction or interaction.”
“Never responded to any of my emails, or comments in canva when email did not work.”
“One week no assignments, next week 20 hours of work!”
Exam style
Exam risk appears low because reviews mainly describe assignments, projects, and discussions, with one online review explicitly saying there are no tests.
Assessment risk
StudentFriendly
82/100
Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.
In-person reviews do not clearly prove a specific exam policy and mostly discuss assignments and grading.
“Have to work hard for grade and he is a little perfectionist.”
Online exam evidence is limited, but one GID33 review clearly says there are no tests and only assignments and discussions.
“There's no tests, just a few graphic design assignments and discussion posts per week.”
Student evidence
Top student voice
“Art classes are all about learning techniques and getting feedback so you can improve, or more importantly, won't develop bad habits that are hard to fix later. With this instructor you get none of that.”
“I can't find a single good lecture he provided during the whole quarter.”
“Prof. Fong doesn't give an EASY A, but if you work hard it pays.”
“Never responded to any of my emails, or comments in canva when email did not work.”
Theme 1
Theme 2
Theme 3
Data context
Analysis sample
30
Recent reviews read by the AI
30
Lifetime ratings
88/100
Evidence confidence
The analysis is based on 30 reviews across many years and formats, with repeated themes about grading, feedback, and communication.
Inside 30 stored ratings
Reported outcomes
22 reported outcomes
A+ 1 · A 7 · A- 5
B+ 2 · B 1 · B- 1
No reported values
No reported values
F 1
Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1