AI Rate Professor

Anthropology

Ana Gonzalez

ANTH13 · ANTH8 · ANTH30452 · ANTH001L · F013 · ANTH1L · F001L · ANTH001 · ANTHF001 · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Take her only if you can handle steady work and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardHeavy WorkloadMixed Teaching QualityStrict GradingHelpful When EngagedExam Risk
  • Student experiences are sharply split, with strong praise from some students and strong warnings from others.
  • Online , and stricter exam controls than most in-person reviews.
  • An A is possible, but it often depends on keeping up with , and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

An A is possible, but many reviews describe lots of than an effortless grade.

and extra-credit examples, while online reviews more often describe heavy work and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The content is manageable for prepared students, but , and fast or .

Online lab reviews describe the course as heavier and more self-directed, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

, but some in-person reviews imply class participation and .

Online evidence focuses on assignment pacing, while success.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

47/100

Students either strongly appreciate her support and and heavy workload.

In-person reviews lean more positive, while online reviews are more divided and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

38/100

very strict or picky in others, so students should not assume easy points.

Format shift

and lenient grading examples, while online reviews more often mention strict or .

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Many reviews mention lots of homework, reading, papers, labs, quizzes, or busywork, especially online.

Format shift

Online reviews describe the heaviest workload, while .

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

She can be helpful, caring, and engaging, but multiple students also describe rude communication, unclear grading, or weak organization.

Format shift

, while online feedback is much more polarized.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Reviews mention , and research papers rather than one single assessment type.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize quizzes, labs, homework, and proctored exams, while , and hands-on work.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are more favorable overall, with several , and , though workload and grading vary.

Main concern

, and lots of homework.

What students said

“ and .”
ANTH001
“Shes a yet only gives you 10 points for it.”
ANTHF001
“Fun lectures, lots of hands on forensic experience, and also visiting lectures from experts in the field.”
ANTH13

Remote format

Online

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are polarized, with some students praising support but many , and proctored exams.

Main concern

, and tightly proctored.

What students said

“ . SO MUCH BUSYWORK.”
ANTH8
“ .”
ANTH1L
“Prof Gonzalez was excellent.”
ANTH001

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

in-person course to proctored and closed-note online lab exams.

Open-Note TestsProctored Online ExamsProctorio ExtensionClosed-Note FinalIn-Person Final

Assessment risk

Varies

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and final, plus other sections with a and hard bone tests.

Open-Note TestsFinal ExamHard Bone Tests
“ and .”
ANTH001
“She gives a , and .”
ANTHF001
“ .”
F013

Online

Online reviews explicitly mention proctored exams, Proctorio, and a cumulative closed-note or .

Proctored Online ExamsProctorio ExtensionClosed-Note FinalClosed-Book Final
“ .”
ANTH1L
“The .”
F001L
“Final was cumulative, closed note/closed book, and .”
ANTH1L

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . SO MUCH BUSYWORK.”

Voice snapshots generated from 20 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

52/100

“Prof Gonzalez was excellent.”

⚖️

38/100

“Very strict with the grading.”

📚 Workload Pressure

25/100

“SO MUCH BUSYWORK.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very understanding and kind.
  • She was really rude, and I really felt disrespected when she would talk to me or .
  • Fun lectures, lots of hands on forensic experience, and also visiting lectures from experts in the field.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • , as long as you turn in .
  • Very strict with the grading.
  • No room for error in .

Theme 3

📝

  • Lots of throughout the quarter, and several hour+ long videos to watch.
  • .
  • and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

20

Recent reviews read by the AI

19

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty reviews across online and but highly mixed evidence over many years.

Inside 20 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 53
1 out of 55

Course coverage

ANTH0014 reviews
ANTH1L4 reviews
ANTH133 reviews
ANTH001L2 reviews
ANTH82 reviews
Show 4 more courses
F001L2 reviews
ANTH304521 review
ANTHF0011 review
F0131 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

16 reported outcomes

A range

11

A+ 3 · A 5 · A- 3

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1