Is this an easy A?
EasyA
86/100Students repeatedly say the class is easy and grades are lenient if .
Both formats support easy grades, with online reviews .
The decision
Key questions
Is this an easy A?
Students repeatedly say the class is easy and grades are lenient if assignments are submitted.
Both formats support easy grades, with online reviews more directly praising lenient grading.
Is the course easy?
The material is described as easy and straightforward, though often boring and self-taught.
Online reviews emphasize textbook learning, while in-person reviews describe the course as easy but dull.
Is attendance flexible?
Reviews do not give a clear attendance policy, but online work and assignment completion appear more important than strict attendance.
Online evidence centers on Canvas-style assignments, while in-person reviews do not clearly establish attendance requirements.
Is this professor recommended?
Students recommend her mainly for easy points, but many advise avoiding her for weak teaching and poor engagement.
Online reviews are split between easy-grade praise and self-teaching complaints, while in-person reviews lean bored and low-value.
Course guide
Grading
Generous
88/100
Multiple students say grading is lenient or easy as long as work is turned in.
Format shift
Online reviews provide the strongest evidence for lenient grading, while in-person grades also suggest low grade risk.
Workload
Moderate
56/100
The class is easy, but students mention projects, labs, readings, discussions, and some excessive assignments.
Format shift
Online reviews mention projects and weekly work, while in-person reviews mention labs and readings that are doable.
Teaching experience
Poor
32/100
Many students say she does not really teach, provides little feedback, and makes the course boring.
Format shift
Online students stress self-teaching and slow grading, while in-person students stress boring classes and limited interaction.
Assessment method
FocusOnAssignments
28/100
Reviews mention discussions, labs, projects, lectures, readings, and only limited midterm evidence.
Format shift
Both formats appear assignment-focused, with one in-person review listing labs, discussions, a midterm, and a final project.
Luni fit check
Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.
Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.
Course format
Classroom format
Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter
In-person reviews also call the class easy but often boring, low-value, and light on real teaching.
Main concern
Students say the course is not engaging and may feel like a waste of time.
What students said
“The class is easy but boring, kind of a waste of money and waste of time.”
“even though you can get a good grade, you don't really learn anything from this class...”
Remote format
High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter
Online reviews describe easy grading, textbook-driven learning, brief lectures, slow grading, and weak engagement.
Main concern
Students say they are mostly on their own and receive little feedback.
What students said
“She doesn't really teach, you are on your own.”
“Her grading, however, is very lenient.”
Exam style
Exam policy is not clearly established, and the course appears mostly assignment- and project-based.
Assessment risk
Varies
55/100
Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.
In-person reviews mention a 30-point midterm and final project but do not clearly prove exam rules or proctoring.
“four 10pt discussions, five 100pt labs, 30pt midterm, discussions are easy, labs are confusing, but do-able, typically 12 questions, a final project”
Online reviews mention only one midterm and do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, webcam use, or final exam format.
“The only test we had so far was the midterm.”
Student evidence
Top student voice
“Only take her class for some easy points.”
“Worst Professor ever! You learn everything yourself in the text book.”
“Such an easy grader! You will do very well as long as you turn in assignments on time.”
“I would not retake or have her as my professor.”
Theme 1
Theme 2
Theme 3
Data context
Analysis sample
14
Recent reviews read by the AI
13
Lifetime ratings
82/100
Evidence confidence
The rating uses 14 reviews across several years and both formats, with consistent agreement that grading is easy but teaching quality is weak.
Inside 14 stored ratings
Reported outcomes
12 reported outcomes
A 5 · A- 1
B+ 1 · B 2
No reported values
No reported values
No reported values
Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 1