Is this an easy A?
MissionImpossible
16/100Students repeatedly say , so an A is difficult even when the course content feels manageable.
Both formats report harsh grading, with online reviews adding late feedback and .
GEOG10 · GEOGF001 · GIST052 · GEOG1 · GISTF011 · GEO01 · GEOG01 · FOO1 · GEO001 · F010 · GEOG001 · GIST11 · GEOGF010 · 49 lifetime ratings
The decision
Key questions
Is this an easy A?
Students repeatedly say minor mistakes cost major points, so an A is difficult even when the course content feels manageable.
Both formats report harsh grading, with online reviews adding late feedback and in-person reviews adding confusing lectures.
Is the course easy?
The subject matter is not always described as hard, but his assignments, reading load, and grading style make the class feel much harder.
Online students mention textbook-heavy self-teaching, while in-person students mention dry or confusing lectures.
Is attendance flexible?
Some reviews mention participation and required online meetings, but the evidence does not prove one consistent attendance policy.
Online reviews include one required-meeting complaint, while in-person reviews often say participation matters.
Is this professor recommended?
Most students do not recommend him because grading feels harsh, unclear, late, and disproportionate to course level.
Negative recommendations are strong in both formats, with only scattered positive comments in each.
Course guide
Grading
Harsh
8/100
Students consistently say he marks down tiny mistakes, gives little partial credit, and makes full credit nearly impossible.
Format shift
Harsh grading is the clearest pattern in both online and in-person reviews.
Workload
Heavy
25/100
Reviews describe lots of reading, difficult assignments, labs, quizzes, discussions, and heavy website work.
Format shift
Online reviews emphasize textbook reading and assignments, while in-person reviews mention labs, participation, and tests.
Teaching experience
Awful
25/100
Most reviews describe poor explanations, weak feedback, slow responses, and students needing to teach themselves.
Format shift
Online reviews focus on absent support and late feedback, while in-person reviews focus on confusing or boring lectures.
Assessment method
Balanced
55/100
Reviews mention labs, assignments, quizzes, discussions, projects, tests, midterms, finals, and reading-based work.
Format shift
Online sections appear assignment-heavy, while in-person sections include more participation, labs, study guides, and tests.
Luni fit check
Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.
Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.
Course format
Classroom format
High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward
In-person reviews also emphasize harsh grading and confusing lectures, though a few students praise his passion and extra credit.
Main concern
In-person students most often complain that lectures are unclear and grading leaves little room for small mistakes.
What students said
“he looks for reasons to dock points.”
“He gives a ton of extra credits, A TON!”
“Be prepared to teach yourself everything for this class”
Remote format
High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro
Online reviews are very negative, with repeated complaints about slow grading, unclear feedback, hard assignments, and harsh point deductions.
Main concern
Online students often feel they must teach themselves while waiting too long for useful feedback.
What students said
“He takes forever to grade stuff and is incredibly harsh when he does.”
“He grades months late so don't expect to get anything back on time.”
“they're all open book.”
Exam style
Exam evidence is mixed, with some online open-book exams, one locked exam complaint, and in-person tests without clear proctoring details.
Assessment risk
Varies
50/100
Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.
In-person reviews mention midterms, finals, study guides, and quizzes, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or proctoring details.
“His study guide for both the midterm and final are about 40 pages long”
“I had in-class assignments and quizzes weekly and they were tough.”
“Graded by few things”
Online reviews explicitly mention open-book exams in one course and locked exams in another, but do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, or proctoring rules.
“they're all open book.”
“The exams locked so I was unable to see what I got wrong”
“Lots of tests.”
Student evidence
Top student voice
“He constantly looks for reasons to take off points and nit picks the smallest issues on even the most inconsequential assignments”
“You will get marked down for the smallest mistakes.”
“Terrible. Does not explain anything, just makes students read the textbook and watch YT videos from profs at other schools.”
“I absolutely do not recommend this teacher!”
Theme 1
Theme 2
Theme 3
Data context
Analysis sample
50
Recent reviews read by the AI
49
Lifetime ratings
95/100
Evidence confidence
Credibility is high because 50 reviews across many years and both formats show a very consistent pattern of harsh grading and weak feedback.
Inside 50 stored ratings
Reported outcomes
40 reported outcomes
A+ 3 · A 3 · A- 1
B+ 3 · B 6 · B- 3
C+ 3 · C 4 · C- 1
D 1
No reported values
Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 9 · Rather not say 1