AI Rate Professor

Foothill College · Radiological Sciences

Grant Lackey

FT074 · RT54CPATHO · CROSSSECTIONAL1 · RT53AL · RT72 · RT62A · 62A · RT54C · RT62 · 39 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you want an excellent instructor who makes demanding RT material understandable but still expects real effort.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerSupportive and approachableClear clinical explanationsPassionate radiology expertFair but demandingEngaging and humorous
  • Students consistently describe Grant Lackey as knowledgeable, supportive, passionate, and easy to approach.
  • The course is fair but not effortless, with students often saying they need to work for their grade.
  • His teaching is strongest when breaking down difficult radiology or anatomy content and checking understanding.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

61/100

Grades are fair and many students earn A's, but comments repeatedly say students must study, participate, and work for them.

Both formats show effort-for-reward, with , and cumulative finals.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The material can be challenging, but he breaks it down clearly and uses examples, reviews, and visuals to make it manageable.

Online reviews emphasize self-directed learning, while and repeated support.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Reviews do not prove a , but participation and class engagement appear important for success.

, while online reviews emphasize participation and checking understanding.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

100/100

Students strongly recommend him because , and effective at teaching hard material.

Recommendation is extremely strong in both formats, with .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

64/100

Students describe grading as fair and supported by reviews or , but not overly easy.

Format shift

Online reviews mention and reviewing quiz answers, while and preparation.

Workload

Moderate

53/100

The workload is meaningful, with quizzes, tests, reading, cumulative material, and hands-on preparation in several courses.

Format shift

and reading more often, while online reviews stress self-directed effort.

Teaching experience

Excellent

99/100

Students consistently praise his knowledge, passion, humor, support, accessibility, and .

Format shift

Both formats show excellent teaching, with in-person reviews providing broader course coverage.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

74/100

, and test preparation, though assignments and participation also matter.

Format shift

, and tests more directly than online evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

35 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews strongly , and ability to explain difficult material.

Main concern

Some , and mandatory engagement.

What students said

“This class may seem easy, but you need to put work in to this class.”
RT72
“You'll have to work for your grade, but he makes it easy to want to do the work.”
RT62A

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews praise his accessibility, , and , with some effort required.

Main concern

Students still need to participate, study, and work for the grade.

What students said

“Hes laid back, but will make you work for your grade.”
RT54C
“You are really in charge of how much you learn in this class”
RT62A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and , but reviews say he prepares students well and .

QuizzesTestsMidtermFinalCumulative FinalReview Before Exams

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews , and review before exams, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules.

Hard QuizzesMidtermFinalCumulative FinalExam Reviews
“The was mainly from the text book.”
RT72
“Leading to the final can be hard since it is cumulative however the .”
RT54C

Online

Online reviews mention quizzes and reviewing questionable quiz answers, but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, open-book, or .

QuizzesQuiz Review
“ and open to review questionable answers on a quiz.”
CROSSSECTIONAL1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Grant is one of the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 39 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, effort, assessment, and support. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

99/100

“Grant is very good at breaking things down to make the content easier to understand.”

📚 Effort Required

61/100

“You'll have to work for your grade, but he makes it easy to want to do the work.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

100/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He keeps you engaged and elaborates the material well.
  • and concise.
  • He made lectures easy to understand and engaging.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • This class may seem easy, but you need to put work in to this class.
  • Hes laid back, but will make you work for your grade.
  • .

Theme 3

❤️ About Support and Character

  • Always willing to help any student and answers all questions during the lecture.
  • Grant went the extra mile to help out in any way possible to make sure we all succeeded.
  • and easy to talk to during breaks or office hours.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

39

Recent reviews read by the AI

39

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-nine reviews across several RT courses are detailed, recent, and highly consistent in their praise.

Inside 39 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 537
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CROSSSECTIONAL111 reviews
RT54CPATHO8 reviews
RT62A7 reviews
FT0744 reviews
RT54C3 reviews
Show 4 more courses
RT723 reviews
62A1 review
RT53AL1 review
RT621 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

37 reported outcomes

A range

26

A+ 1 · A 23 · A- 2

B range

10

B+ 2 · B 8

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values