AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Douglas Lublin

MATH1A · MATH1C · 2B · MATH48B · 1A · 1D · MATH1D · MATH1B · 22 lifetime ratings

AI rating
72/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
62.5%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

if you want deep conceptual math and are comfortable preparing seriously for unforgiving assessments.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerConceptual MathCaring ProfessorTest HeavyFair but UnforgivingSelf-Study Needed
  • Many students praise Lublin as passionate, qualified, caring, and strong at conceptual math teaching.
  • Grades , and finals, so small mistakes can carry major consequences.
  • Students who like theory and , while GPA-focused students may find him risky.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Getting an A is realistic for prepared students, but , and often unforgiving.

The meaningful evidence is almost entirely in person; the only online review is too vague to affect the score.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

36/100

The course content is concept-heavy calculus or advanced math, and several students .

In-person reviews consistently describe challenging conceptual math, while online evidence is insufficient.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Attendance is not clearly described as strictly mandatory, but , and .

In-person evidence supports strong attendance and preparation habits, while online .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

, but others warn that his difficulty and grading can hurt grades.

The because the single online review is not informative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Students call him fair and sometimes generous with partial credit, but .

Format shift

In-person reviews show both fairness and ; online evidence is too thin to judge.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

as reasonable or minimal, but real preparation time is needed for and readings.

Format shift

In-person workload appears moderate, while online workload cannot be assessed from the single vague review.

Teaching experience

Good

80/100

Many students praise his passion, qualifications, clarity, and care, though .

Format shift

In-person reviews provide strong but mixed evidence, while online evidence is not detailed enough.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

84/100

Grades are heavily shaped by quizzes, midterms, tests, and .

Format shift

, while the online review gives no assessment detail.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

21 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are polarized but mostly describe a caring, passionate professor , and not easy A options.

Main concern

Assessments can be unforgiving, especially when few tests or .

What students said

“ " but are quite unforgiving.”
MATH1C
“If you want an easy A, then this class is not for you.”
MATH 1B

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The single online review is positive but too vague to support strong conclusions.

Main concern

There is not enough online .

What students said

“ABOLOL ABOLOL”
1D

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are often fair but high-stakes and unforgiving, with some student-friendly .

Test HeavyFew High-Stakes AssessmentsNo Calculators in One ReviewNo Curves in One ReviewDropped Test in Some Sections

Assessment risk

Strict

36/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe quizzes, midterms, tests, and finals as central, with and only course-specific notes like no calculators or dropped assessments.

QuizzesMidtermsDifficult FinalNo CalculatorsDropped Lowest Assessment
“ . 3 tests but .”
MATH1C
“ as well.”
MATH1C

Online

The single online review does not clearly prove .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you want an easy A, then this class is not for you.”

Voice snapshots generated from 22 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

80/100

“Fantastic math professor!”

🧠 Conceptual Difficulty

36/100

“He's really good at getting you to truly understand the concepts, to get not just the "how" but the "why".”

🧪

36/100

“ " but are quite unforgiving.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He pushes you to think through the heart.
  • .
  • He speeds through lectures/gets over excited, does not adequately go over the .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • If you want an easy A, then this class is not for you.
  • Getting a C is unlikely
  • A is only possible if you already finished all the concepts of calculus.

Theme 3

🧪 About Assessments

  • The entire grade was made up of 9 quizzes, one of which was dropped.
  • and are very conceptual base.
  • His midterms and , but !!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

22

Recent reviews read by the AI

22

Lifetime ratings

76/100

Evidence confidence

There are 22 reviews with detailed in-person evidence, but only one vague online review and opinions are polarized across years and courses.

Inside 22 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 514
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATH1C5 reviews
MATH1D4 reviews
1D3 reviews
MATH48B3 reviews
1A2 reviews
Show 4 more courses
MATH1A2 reviews
2B1 review
MATH 1B1 review
MATH1B1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

18 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 3 · A 4 · A- 2

B range

3

B 1 · B- 2

C range

3

C+ 1 · C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1