AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Diana Uilecan

MATH235 · 48A · MATH220 · B1 · MATH48A · MATH105 · MATH10503 · 1B · MATH48B · 1A · MATH48C · MATH48BC · 63 lifetime ratings

AI rating
27/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
34.69%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

if you are confident in math and can study independently for .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderExam heavyLots of homeworkPolarized teachingLimited partial credit
  • Reviews are polarized, with but many recent students reporting little teaching and .
  • Grades often depend heavily on midterms and finals, and .
  • Students with prior math strength may manage, but beginners face high risk from fast pacing, limited support, and strict assessment.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

31/100

An A is possible in some courses, but most reviews , and exams that dominate the grade.

Online evidence includes rare easy-A reports but many recent exam-heavy warnings, while students who handle strict grading.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

36/100

The math content becomes challenging because lectures may be fast or unclear and .

Online students often report self-teaching from videos, while and .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

Attendance policy varies by course, with and others saying missing class hurts success.

In-person evidence is mixed, while online reviews emphasize required in-person .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

34/100

Most recent students warn against taking her because of , and heavy homework, despite a positive minority.

Online recommendation has dropped sharply in recent reviews, while but still risky.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students repeatedly report harsh grading, little partial credit, no , and .

Format shift

Both formats show strict grading, with in-person reviews especially mentioning little partial credit and .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Workload is heavy because many reviews describe lots of , and studying that may count less than exams.

Format shift

Online reviews often pair heavy homework with weak lecture support, while and frequent quizzes.

Teaching experience

Poor

40/100

Teaching quality is inconsistent, with strong praise from some students but frequent complaints that .

Format shift

Online teaching is weaker in recent reviews because students cite YouTube videos and little support, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

84/100

Assessment is exam-heavy, with many comments saying midterms and .

Format shift

Online reviews repeatedly cite midterm and final weight around 65%, while few tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

29 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mixed across years, with praise for clear lectures in some courses but , and .

Main concern

Students often need strong preparation because and .

What students said

“the average for our midterm was a 54%..”
1A
“ .”
1A
“ .”
MATH48A

Remote format

Online

21 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative in recent years, especially about YouTube-based lectures, in-person exams for online classes, and .

Main concern

Online students report that the class can feel asynchronous but .

What students said

“Signed up for an asynchronous online class and the .”
1B
“Uses random YouTube videos for lectures, grades insanely harshly, and exams are worth 65% of your grade.”
1A
“ .”
MATH48B

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because tests are heavily weighted, often difficult, sometimes in person for online sections, and graded with limited partial credit.

In-Person Exams For Online ClassMidterm And Final HeavyOne-Page Notes AllowedTimed QuizzesLittle Partial Credit

Assessment risk

Strict

22/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person evidence shows tests, quizzes, midterms, and and limited partial credit, but reviews do not clearly prove open-book or closed-book rules.

Two Midterms And FinalTimed QuizzesLimited Partial CreditNo Extra Credit
“2 midterms and 1 final. 6-7 quizzes over the course.”
1A
“class grade is .”
B1
“all quizzes and ”
MATH48BC

Online

Online evidence shows in-person midterm and weighting, one-page notes allowed in one review, and no clear proof of webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book exams.

In-Person ExamsMidterm And Final 65%One-Page Notes AllowedTimed Upload Quizzes
“Signed up for an asynchronous online class and the .”
1B
“You get to bring a page of notes which is good.”
B1
“ and upload it on canvas within a time limit.”
1A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Midterm and and worth 65% of the grade.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

40/100

“Doesn't really teach the material and expects students to know high level problem solving.”

⚖️

18/100

“ .”

🧪

22/100

“class grade is .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She gives great lectures with many example problems, and the .
  • , no teaching whatsoever, barely any office hours, no coherent resources, and tons of homework.
  • She is really good at explaining and lecturing, but she goes SO FAST and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Very hard to get an A. No given.
  • She grades HARSH and .
  • The .

Theme 3

🧪 About Exams

  • the .
  • Midterm and and worth 65% of the grade.
  • The average grade for both the midterm and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

63

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 50 reviews across many years and both formats give , and teaching consistency.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 519
4 out of 52
3 out of 55
2 out of 512
1 out of 526

Course coverage

1A18 reviews
MATH48A9 reviews
B17 reviews
1B3 reviews
MATH1053 reviews
Show 7 more courses
MATH48B3 reviews
48A2 reviews
MATH105031 review
MATH2201 review
MATH2351 review
MATH48BC1 review
MATH48C1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

39 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 5 · A 5

B range

5

B+ 1 · B 3 · B- 1

C range

3

C 3

D range

1

D 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

19

Drop/Withdrawal 4 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 10 · Rather not say 4