AI Rate Professor

Pharmacy

Noren Lopez

PHT58 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
0/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

unless you can teach yourself difficult material and tolerate harsh testing with little support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHostile ToneSlide ReadingTest HeavyHarsh GradingPoor Support
  • All reviews are strongly negative and describe hostile or dismissive interactions with students.
  • Students say lectures are mostly slide reading with .
  • Exams are described as long, mismatched to lectures or study guides, and connected to severe failure or withdrawal outcomes.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

2/100

Reviews describe , and no realistic path to an easy A.

because there are zero online reviews.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

8/100

Students say the course becomes overwhelming because the and guidance is poor.

because there are zero online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

10/100

but not valuable because students mainly hear slides read word for word.

because there are zero online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

0/100

No review recommends her, and students repeatedly .

because there are zero online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

0/100

Students report , and exams that do not match lectures or study questions.

Format shift

.

Workload

Overwhelming

5/100

Students describe overwhelming slide material, very long tests, and insufficient guidance for the workload.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Awful

5/100

Reviews consistently describe slide reading, hostility to questions, and .

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

92/100

Reviews focus heavily on tests and exams as the main source of difficulty and failure.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews consistently describe hostile , and exams that feel unfair or unsupported.

Main concern

Students report while facing very difficult and .

What students said

“ .”
PHT58
“98% of the class failed her tests.”
PHT58
“ .”
PHT58

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because students say tests are long, poorly aligned, and connected to severe failure rates.

Long TestsMismatched ExamsInaccurate Study GuidesTest Heavy

Assessment risk

Strict

5/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

guides, and exams that do not match lectures or study questions, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or proctoring.

Long TestsMismatched ExamsInaccurate Study GuidesTest Heavy
“ .”
PHT58
“The and she doesn't give out accurate study guides.”
PHT58
“98% of the class failed her tests.”
PHT58

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You'll attend just .”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and classroom climate. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

5/100

“ .”

🚫 Recommendation Level

0/100

“ !!!!!!!”

🧪

5/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • During the lectures, she basically just reads off a bunch of .
  • She said we have to learn on our own!
  • .

Theme 2

📉

  • 98% of the class failed her tests.
  • The and she doesn't give out accurate study guides.
  • Noren is one of those professors that is proud to fail an entire class.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Climate

  • She is rude, unapproachable, and hostile to questions or feedback.
  • She has yelled/talks down to the class!
  • She is condescending and hostile towards students that confront her on her teaching and exams.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

64/100

Evidence confidence

, but they are recent, detailed, and completely consistent in their negative assessment.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 55

Course coverage

PHT585 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 1