AI Rate Professor

Economics

Malkait Sandhu

ECONF100A · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

unless , and handle unclear lectures.

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing LecturesTough GraderLecture HeavyPoor OrganizationLow Recommendation
  • , but both raise serious concerns about lecture quality and .
  • Students say lectures are , distracted, or not aligned with the book.
  • There is no online evidence, so the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

An A looks hard because one student failed and another says grades suffer without detailed notes from .

because there are zero online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The course may not be inherently advanced, but poor pacing and hard-to-follow lectures make it feel challenging.

because there are zero online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

Attendance appears practically required because one review says students will suffer if .

because there are zero online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

10/100

Students do not recommend him because , and .

because there are zero online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

because and the only reported grade is an F.

Format shift

because there are zero online reviews.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

The workload burden comes , and note-taking rather than clearly described assignments.

Format shift

because there are zero online reviews.

Teaching experience

Awful

25/100

Teaching quality is poor because students describe hard-to-follow lectures, distractions, wasted class time, and mismatched book content.

Format shift

because there are zero online reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not clearly describe assessments, so the method cannot be confidently classified beyond grade risk tied to lectures and notes.

Format shift

because there are zero online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews describe confusing, lecture-heavy instruction with and weak course alignment.

Main concern

Students may struggle because lectures are and notes matter more than the book.

What students said

“not good, I had a hard time following everything.”
ECONF100A
“He got distracted easily during lectures which meant many of our class periods were wasted by him telling unrelated stories.”
ECONF100A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the final format.

Assessment risk

Varies

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, closed-book rules, proctoring, midterm format, or .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He got distracted easily during lectures which meant many of our class periods were wasted by him telling unrelated stories.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching clarity and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“not good, I had a hard time following everything.”

⚖️

18/100

“The book is different from what he teaches in class, so if .”

👎 Recommendation Risk

10/100

“He gave his other class sections more opportunities and better, more well paced lectures.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • not good, I had a hard time following everything.
  • He got distracted easily during lectures which meant many of our class periods were wasted by him telling unrelated stories.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades & Notes

  • The book is different from what he teaches in class, so if .
  • He gave his other class sections more opportunities and better, more well paced lectures.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because only 2 reviews are available and one is much older, though both are consistently negative.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ECONF100A2 reviews

Reported outcomes

F results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1