AI Rate Professor

Language Arts

Ulysses Acevedo

ETHNIC · 22 lifetime ratings

AI rating
74/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
60.87%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you can handle regular reading and writing for .

Best fit · Effort For RewardHeavy ReadingFlexible GradingLate FeedbackEngaging In PersonMixed Organization
  • Grades are often forgiving, but reading and writing can feel heavier than expected.
  • In-person students more often praise his lectures, humor, and class engagement.
  • Online reviews are more divided, with repeated complaints about organization and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

An A is very realistic because , but students still need to keep up with , and discussions.

Online evidence shows easy grading with heavier workload complaints, while doing well easy.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

64/100

The , but the and organization issues make it feel harder for some students.

Online reviews describe simple assignments but , while and more engaging class sessions.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Participation matters often appears, but reviews do not show a .

In-person reviews emphasize attending regularly, while online reviews and assignments.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

Students recommend him for kindness and , but , and organization issues create real hesitation.

, while online reviews are sharply mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

Students repeatedly say he is not a and allows some flexibility, despite .

Format shift

Online reviews mention late grading but forgiving standards, while and completed work.

Workload

Heavy

34/100

The course often has substantial reading, writing, discussion posts, papers, or group work for an introductory class.

Format shift

Online workload complaints are stronger, while .

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

He is often described as caring and engaging, but some students report weak organization, slow responses, and uneven lecture quality.

Format shift

, while online teaching draws more complaints about organization and .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Reviews mostly mention readings, discussion , and assignments rather than major exams.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize written assignments and quizzes, while , and participation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are more positive, emphasizing engaging lectures, humor, and manageable work when students attend.

Main concern

Some students still find the and the lecture coverage uneven.

What students said

“His class is fun, interactive, and very engaging.”
ETHNIC
“work is not crazy and everything is covered in the lectures.”
ETHNIC
“Yes, there is a lot of .”
ETHNIC

Remote format

Online

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are split between caring and , and slow grading.

Main concern

Slow grading and .

What students said

“He grades easy, but there is .”
ETHNIC
“Takes a VERY .”
ETHNIC
“The class requires ALOT of writing and reading (links he will provide) however the .”
ETHNIC

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes and a midterm but do not clearly prove open-book rules, proctoring, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or closed-book exams.

Quizzes MentionedMidterm MentionedAssignment FocusedExam Policy Unclear

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a midterm, but they do not clearly prove closed-book rules or strict proctoring.

Weekly QuizzesTextbook-Based MidtermPolicy Unclear
“Weekly quizzes and and other materials.”
ETHNIC
“The must respond to in two paragraphs.”
ETHNIC

Online

Online reviews mention quizzes and , but they do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or .

Quizzes MentionedAssignment FocusedPolicy Unclear
“ and assignments and . The ”
ETHNIC

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He grades easy, but there is .”

Voice snapshots generated from 23 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

70/100

“His class is fun, interactive, and very engaging.”

📚 Workload Reality

34/100

“The workload was much heavier than expected for the class level.”

⚖️

76/100

“he is not a so i dont think it really matters.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Acevedo is an amazing professor.
  • His lectures are very entertaining and .
  • Taking this class in person. Prof lacks knowledge, and Googles stuff on his phone during lecture because he is stumped by simple questions.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • The class requires ALOT of writing and reading (links he will provide) however the .
  • This isn't the easy A class you think it's going to be.
  • The and hard to read because it is all scanned in from an old book.

Theme 3

⚖️ About Grades

  • he was a , but he is not a
  • Takes a VERY .
  • As long as you do the work, you will do great in his class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

23

Recent reviews read by the AI

22

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The judgment is based on 23 recent reviews across both formats with , and engagement.

Inside 23 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 54
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 57

Course coverage

ETHNIC23 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

21 reported outcomes

A range

17

A+ 6 · A 8 · A- 3

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2