AI Rate Professor

Economics

Julian Kearns

1B · 1A · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
87.5%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

He is a strong choice for students who want , and a realistic path to a high grade.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear LecturesSupportive ProfessorPractice Exam AlignmentStraightforward AExam Friendly
  • and helpful notes.
  • Getting an A is very realistic if students keep up with , and practice exams.
  • and closely aligned with practice materials, though online classes may require an .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

An A is very achievable because , and practice exams closely prepare students for mostly multiple-choice assessments.

Online and steady work, though online may include a .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

and lectures, though some midterms are described as somewhat difficult.

Online reviews praise clarity and support, while and representative exams.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

70/100

as strict, but and regular engagement matter.

, while online evidence focuses more on completing homework and practice exams.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

93/100

Students strongly recommend him because he teaches clearly, supports students, and makes exams fair and predictable.

Both formats are positive, with online reviews especially enthusiastic about his course design.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

86/100

Grading is student-friendly because late homework and materials, and one review mentions a big final curve.

Format shift

Online reviews mention a and straightforward grading, while or quizzes.

Workload

Light

75/100

The workload appears manageable if students keep up with , and weekly discussion posts.

Format shift

Online work includes notes, homework, and practice exams, while and exams.

Teaching experience

Excellent

95/100

, and well-designed materials.

Format shift

Online reviews highlight interactive lectures and accessibility, while and strong class structure.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

, and finals, with exams supported by similar practice materials.

Format shift

Online reviews mention homework, practice exams, midterms, and finals, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews describe funny, , and low-pressure assessments.

Main concern

Students still and prepare from practice materials.

What students said

“his lectures are funny and easy to follow.”
1B
“He provides practice midterms that are representative of the midterms and final.”
1A

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are very positive, especially about clear notes, accessible support, interactive lectures, and a straightforward path to an A.

Main concern

The main concern is that some online sections still require an .

What students said

“It's very straightforward to get an A+ in his class, read all of his chapter notes and do all of and .”
1B
“This was the , and I have taken lots.”
1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are mostly multiple choice and closely aligned with practice exams, making them student-friendly .

Multiple Choice ExamsPractice Exams MatchFinal CurveIn-Person Final For Online

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

86/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and midterms or finals that are extremely similar to practice exams.

Multiple Choice ExamsPractice Exams Match
“the midterms and . everything is mcq.”
1B
“He provides practice midterms that are representative of the midterms and final.”
1A

Online

Online reviews explicitly mention an in-person final option, local proctoring, multiple-choice format, practice exams, and a , but do not prove webcam or Lockdown Browser use.

In-Person FinalLocal Proctoring OptionMultiple Choice ExamPractice ExamsFinal Curve
“In my case, I was able to get it proctored at a local CC and the .”
1B
“ .”
1A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This was the , and I have taken lots.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

95/100

“The lectures and , and Kearns was easy to get in touch with and really nice and helpful.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

93/100

“ !”

📈 Grade Path

88/100

“It's very straightforward to get an A+ in his class, read all of his chapter notes and do all of and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • his lectures are funny and easy to follow.
  • Amazing prof, good notes & assignments, concepts are super clear, easy to get in touch with.

Theme 2

📝 About Exams

  • the midterms and . everything is mcq.
  • In my case, I was able to get it proctored at a local CC and the .

Theme 3

📈 About Grades

  • , so there was no pressure to be right so it turned into a .
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

The review count is small at 8, but the comments are recent, detailed, and strongly consistent.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

1A6 reviews
1B2 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 2 · A 3 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

1

D- 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values