AI Rate Professor

Foothill College · English

Stephanie Chan

ENGL1B · ENGL1A · ENG1A · ENGL1BH · ENG110 · ENGLISH1A · ENG1B · ENG · ENG1BH · ENGF001B · ENG1C · 46 lifetime ratings

AI rating
36/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
28.95%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Take Stephanie Chan only if you can handle a heavy writing workload and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHeavy ReadingSlow GradingTough GraderUnorganized AssignmentsHelpful Office Hours
  • , and slow grading.
  • Online reviews are much more negative, with and .
  • Some in-person students praise her support and , but experiences are sharply mixed.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

An A is possible, but students repeatedly , and tolerance for slow grading.

Online students describe a harder path to an A, while and completing work can be enough.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

The course content is reading- and writing-heavy, with abstract essay expectations and fast assignment pacing for many students.

Online reviews emphasize confusing assignment structure, while and office-hour support.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

42/100

, but strict mandatory attendance is not consistently proven across reviews.

In-person reviews mention participation and showing up more directly, while online reviews focus more on deadlines and assignments.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

34/100

Most recent students do not recommend her because the workload, slow grading, and .

Online recommendations are especially poor, while and strong warnings.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Students frequently call her a tough or and AI-related concerns.

Format shift

, but online reviews describe harsher consequences and .

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

Reviews repeatedly mention lots of , and workload heavy enough to dominate the quarter.

Format shift

Online workload complaints are more intense, while as heavy.

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

She can be caring and , but many students describe disorganization, unclear instructions, and .

Format shift

In-person teaching receives more praise, while online teaching is often described as confusing and poorly supported.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Grades appear , and writing assignments rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize essays and finals.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

27 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mixed, with and class discussions while others complain about disorganization, heavy work, and .

Main concern

The same workload and , but office hours and live discussion help some students.

What students said

“ and offered many opportunities to improve our scores and develop our skills as writers.”
ENGL1B
“Lots of reading too, and a !”
ENG1B

Remote format

Online

20 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative because , and limited useful feedback.

Main concern

Students often do not know grades or expectations until very late.

What students said

“she grades super slowly and you won't have any idea what your grades are until weeks after the .”
ENGL1A
“She throws tons of time, with a strict late policy, while she cannot even grade in time.”
ENG1B

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a consistent exam policy, and .

Papers HeavyMidterm MentionedFinal MentionedEasy Exams Mentioned

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and final experiences, but does not clearly prove book policy or .

Easy MidtermEasy FinalMidterm MentionedFinal Mentioned
“ and if you even scanned the books.”
ENG1A
“3-4 quizzes (easy if ”
ENGL1B

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, open-book, midterm, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She throws tons of time, with a strict late policy, while she cannot even grade in time.”

Voice snapshots generated from 47 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“ and enthusiastic.”

⚖️

28/100

“ explanation.”

📚 Workload Pressure

18/100

“I actually ended up cutting back hours at my job to deal with the crazy workload.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Stephanie is an exceptional teacher, and cares deeply about her students.
  • and does not teach at all.
  • and offered many opportunities to improve our scores and develop our skills as writers.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • She gives hw every day.
  • There are about 2-4 discussions each week and an essay every 2 weeks for a total of 5.
  • Get ready for the amount of homework if .

Theme 3

⚖️

  • She literally doesn't tell you what you get for assignments and the .
  • She grades her students as though they were to attend Harvard.
  • Not a .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

47

Recent reviews read by the AI

46

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is credible because it uses 47 reviews across many years and both formats, with , and organization.

Inside 47 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 515
4 out of 53
3 out of 54
2 out of 56
1 out of 519

Course coverage

ENG1B15 reviews
ENG1A9 reviews
ENGL1B5 reviews
ENGF001B4 reviews
ENG1103 reviews
Show 6 more courses
ENG1BH3 reviews
ENG1C2 reviews
ENGL1A2 reviews
ENGL1BH2 reviews
ENG1 review
ENGLISH 1A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

31 reported outcomes

A range

13

A 11 · A- 2

B range

5

B+ 1 · B 1 · B- 3

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

10

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 8 · Rather not say 1