AI Rate Professor

Computer Information Systems

Jesse Cecil

CS001A · CS21A · FHCS002A · CS2B · CS2A · CS1B · 1B · CS1A · CS3B · CS22A · CS2AONLINE · CS001B · CS10 · CS3A · CS01A · CSOO2A · CSF001A · 171 lifetime ratings

AI rating
49/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
57.43%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you can and follow assignment details exactly.

Best fit · Self Taught ProSelf-study heavyStrict detail gradingUnclear assignmentsWeekly programming workloadMixed responsiveness
  • Students often earn A grades, but many say the , and unforgiving.
  • Online reviews dominate and and poor responsiveness.
  • The and weekly deadlines.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Many students get A grades, but the A usually requires , and exact compliance with specs.

Online evidence shows more A outcomes but also , while in-person evidence stresses prior knowledge and effort.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The programming content is manageable for prepared students but becomes difficult because instructions are vague and much learning is self-directed.

Online and , and challenging projects rather than an easy lecture-driven course.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Online participation and discussion appear important, but reviews do .

Online reviews mention required discussions and participation more often, while projects.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

Students recommend him when they are independent and organized, but many warn that poor support and .

Online reviews are highly polarized, while and similarly mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

34/100

, but students repeatedly report losing points for small details and late work.

Format shift

Online reviews contain the strongest strict-grading complaints, while .

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Weekly labs, projects, readings, and grades are achievable.

Format shift

Online reviews repeatedly mention weekly assignments, while other.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Some students find him caring and clear, but many describe the class as .

Format shift

Online reviews show the widest split, while and prior knowledge.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

Grades appear , and discussions, with exams mentioned less often.

Format shift

Online reviews mention projects and weekly labs most often, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, and project discipline, with mixed views on teaching help.

Main concern

Beginners may find the class vague and harsh without prior programming experience.

What students said

“You HAVE to be a self starter.”
CS1B
“ and gives unhelpful answers when a beginner in coding asks specifics.”
CS1A

Remote format

Online

40 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students describe a mostly self-guided course with , and strict attention to details.

Main concern

Students may struggle with , and .

What students said

“This is basically a self study class. He provides the material, you teach yourself.”
CS1A
“ .”
CS2B

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is mixed, with some open-book or standard midterm-final comments and other complaints that .

Open Book ExamsMidterm And FinalQuizzesUnclear Exam Coverage

Assessment risk

Varies

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format, proctoring, or open-book policy.

Online

Online reviews mention open-book exams in one course, quizzes, and midterm or , but .

Open Book ExamsMidterm And FinalQuizzesUnclear Exam Coverage
“ .”
CS2B
“The and ask very specific questions.”
CS1A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This is very much a self guided class where it is really up to you to do the reading and make sure you understand the material.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

50/100

“He provides the material, you teach yourself.”

⚖️

34/100

“Really strict on grading, will mark you down for a lot of because you missed one thing.”

📚 Workload Reality

32/100

“The , so be ready to work.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Was mostly a self study course.
  • He is an amazing teacher, always strives to make improvements to his class, and .
  • He adds no original insight, lectures are rehashed notes, and he's unresponsive to questions.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • If you know what you are doing and .
  • You CANNOT be late/lazy. The
  • The though.

Theme 3

🧪 About Exams And Assignments

  • .
  • and unrelated to what we're learning.
  • There are , and a final.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

171

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across several years give strong evidence, though opinions are polarized by student independence and course level.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 556
4 out of 546
3 out of 531
2 out of 512
1 out of 526

Course coverage

CS1B9 reviews
CS001A6 reviews
CS1A5 reviews
CS22A5 reviews
CS001B3 reviews
Show 12 more courses
CS2A3 reviews
CS3A3 reviews
CS3B3 reviews
1B2 reviews
CS2AONLINE2 reviews
CS2B2 reviews
CSOO2A2 reviews
CS01A1 review
CS101 review
CS21A1 review
CSF001A1 review
FHCS002A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

42 reported outcomes

A range

26

A+ 6 · A 14 · A- 6

B range

2

B 1 · B- 1

C range

2

C+ 2

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

11

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 9