AI Rate Professor

Biology

Vasilissa Derugina

BIO1B · BIOL10 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
49/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
53.33%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

Take Derugina if you like detailed, structured lectures and can tolerate strict wording standards, but if lecture style and .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyStrict GraderLecture HeavyEngaging For SomeGrammar FocusedMixed Teaching Quality
  • Reviews are strongly polarized, with some students calling her energetic and caring and others calling the teaching poor or boring.
  • and wording deductions in labs.
  • The course content is usually manageable if , and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Good grades are common when students pay attention and review slides, but .

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The material is mostly manageable and slide-based, though some students find lectures slow, boring, or memorization-heavy.

All course easiness evidence comes from in-person BIOL10 and BIO1B reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

42/100

Attendance appears important because students say paying attention in lecture and .

, and they generally make class participation sound useful.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

Recommendations are split because positive reviews praise her energy and help, while negative reviews criticize professionalism, communication, and grading.

All recommendation evidence is in person, with .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Students repeatedly mention strict grammar, wording, and not very hard.

Format shift

and biology reviews.

Workload

Moderate

57/100

The workload is usually described as expected or manageable, though lectures and labs can feel drawn out.

Format shift

All workload comments are from in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Teaching quality is polarized, with strong praise for enthusiasm and organization offset by complaints about boring lectures and poor communication.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and they conflict sharply.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessments include lab exams, tests, papers, group projects, lectures, and .

Format shift

Assessment evidence comes only from in-person comments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

All evidence is in person and shows a split between enthusiastic praise and serious complaints about teaching style and grading.

Main concern

and uneven classroom communication are the main concerns.

What students said

“Her lectures are very engaging, and the .”
BIOL10
“Boring lecture and ”
BIO1B

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe standard exams and lab tests, but and .

Few-Question MidtermStraightforward TestsStrict Exam GradingLab Exams

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and lab exams, but do not clearly prove open-book rules, closed-book rules, proctoring, or .

Few-Question MidtermStraightforward TestsLab Exams
“ ratio of each question very high, so even a small mistake results in a large deduction.”
BIO1B
“ .”
BIO1B

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Her lectures are alive and captivating.”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation split. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

50/100

“ and the .”

⚖️

28/100

“She's a , and cares a lot about grammar.”

👍 Recommendation Split

52/100

“I found the instructor's demeanor unprofessional, and her communication style often gave the impression that student learning and concerns were not a priority.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lectures are alive and and helpful.
  • Lecture is not interesting at all.
  • Super enthusiastic and .

Theme 2

⚖️

  • Very .
  • Boring lecture and
  • She does not try .

Theme 3

📚

  • 2 tests and research paper.
  • The workload was about what I expected.
  • If you pay attention in lecture and review the need to read the textbook to pass.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

74/100

Evidence confidence

, but the opinions are highly polarized and there is no online evidence.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 55

Course coverage

BIO1B8 reviews
BIOL107 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 2 · A 4

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 3