AI Rate Professor

Dental Assisting

Phylliss Spragge

DHL200 · DHF200L · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
13/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
4.9

The decision

if you can , and unclear deductions.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderHeavy WorkloadRubric FrustrationDemanding WritingKnowledgeable but Harsh
  • Most students describe a workload far beyond the credit value.
  • as strict, inconsistent, and hard to satisfy even when rubrics are followed.
  • A few students praise her knowledge and responsiveness, but the if possible.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

Getting an A requires major effort, close rubric-following, and .

Both online and adding more complaints about heavy writing and low exam scores.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Students often say the , but the course becomes challenging because of workload, writing, and .

Online reviews more often separate clear material from overwhelming work, while and .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Reviews mention participation and deadlines but do not clearly prove a .

Online evidence emphasizes deadlines and participation tasks, while in-person evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

24/100

because the workload and and frustrating.

Both formats lean negative, though a if students use office hours and follow rubrics carefully.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

, and difficulty earning full credit even with effort.

Format shift

Both formats show harsh grading, with online reviews providing more repeated examples of rubric and paper deductions.

Workload

Overwhelming

10/100

The workload is repeatedly described as heavy, writing-intensive, and far above the course unit value.

Format shift

Online reviews give the strongest workload evidence, while a much larger class.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

She is sometimes described as knowledgeable and clear, but the dominant experience is frustration with , and workload.

Format shift

Online reviews are mixed with a few strong positives, while and expectations.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessment , and exams rather than relying on one method only.

Format shift

Online reviews mention papers, quizzes, discussions, and exams, while and a .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, heavy work, and a complex final exam.

Main concern

The .

What students said

“Gives unclear grading rubrics in video discussions, always deducted points even when addressed 'said' issues”
DHL200
“The , and the professor tends to grade rigorously.”
DHL200

Remote format

Online

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews mostly describe heavy weekly writing, strict grading, and and occasional kindness.

Main concern

The main concern is harsh grading combined with a workload that feels much larger than the course units.

What students said

“Workload is HEAVY.”
DHL200
“This course required 1.5 units but seems like 6 or 7 units.”
DHL200
“No one gets over 85% on exams.”
DHL200

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, but reviews do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book status, or closed-book status.

Hard ExamsComplex FinalLow Exam Scores

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but do not clearly prove whether exams are open-book, closed-book, or proctored.

Complex Final
“The , and the professor tends to grade rigorously.”
DHL200

Online

and , but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or closed-book rules.

Hard ExamsLow Exam Scores
“ .”
DHF200L
“No one gets over 85% on exams.”
DHL200

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This course required 1.5 units but seems like 6 or 7 units.”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“ however you will get docked for something regardless”

⚖️

12/100

“ , and she will still add in things you did wrong that were not mentioned anywhere on rubric.”

📚 Workload Pressure

10/100

“ .”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • Workload is HEAVY.
  • This course required 1.5 units but seems like 6 or 7 units.
  • We have 3 long writing assignments due by Wed. and 3 other assignments due by Sat.

Theme 2

⚖️

  • and on top of that
  • She seems like the professor that will because she doesn't believe in A's.
  • Zero leniency for late work

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Spragge is very sweet and .
  • Professor Spragge is a very effective and knowledgeable teacher.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 12 reviews across several years show a consistent pattern of heavy workload and .

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 57

Course coverage

DHL2007 reviews
DHF200L5 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

5

A 3 · A- 2

B range

4

B+ 1 · B- 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1