AI Rate Professor

Foothill College · Physical Ed

Katy Ripp

PHED2047 · VOLLEYBALLTEAM · PHED22B · PHED20A · VOLLEYBALL · KINS2 · KINS1 · PILAT02 · KINES · TAG47B · 30 lifetime ratings

AI rating
72/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
61.9%
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

Katy Ripp is a good pick if you keep up weekly and use , but if strict criteria or attendance rules bother you.

Best fit · Effort For RewardExtra credit availableClear criteriaWeekly assignmentsFormat-dependent experienceAttendance matters
  • Online kinesiology reviews often describe steady weekly work with and .
  • Recent negative , and political or opinion-based frustration.
  • In-person activity classes are often liked, but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Most A reports come from staying current with weekly work and using , not from doing nothing.

Online reviews show more written workload, while and participation.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

67/100

The , but , and module organization can make it feel busier than expected.

Online kinesiology courses feel more assignment-heavy, while unless .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

Online work is deadline-based, while several as important.

attendance, while online reviews focus on weekly submissions.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

67/100

and , but recent negative reviews lower confidence.

Online reviews are more divided than in-person reviews, especially in recent kinesiology courses.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

60/100

helps many students earn A grades, but several reviews describe nitpicking, tough grading, or harsh penalties.

Format shift

Online grading is described as clear but sometimes strict, while .

Workload

Moderate

48/100

The workload is manageable but steady, with , and papers in online classes.

Format shift

Online classes carry more written work, while .

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

Many students praise her organization, responsiveness, and coaching, but .

Format shift

, while online kinesiology reviews are mixed.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Grades , and participation rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

Online reviews mention quizzes and written projects, while and participation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are generally positive for yoga, Pilates, and activity courses, but and busywork.

Main concern

Attendance and punctuality can affect grades in some in-person classes.

What students said

“the yoga class is chill the only thing is MAKE SURE TO BE ON ”
PHED20A
“ ”
PILAT02
“ .”
PHED2047

Remote format

Online

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mixed but often describe clear modules, , and useful .

Main concern

Recent , and lots of reading or writing.

What students said

“1 module quiz, 1 discussion (200+ words) +2 response to classmates, a writing assignment (200-500 words).”
KINS2
“Easy A if you keep up with the work, and a little wiggle room if .”
KINS1
“Instructions for and poorly communicated.”
KINES

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and projects than strict traditional exams, with no clear proof of proctoring or closed-book rules.

Weekly QuizzesMidterm ProjectFinal PaperFinal ProjectNot Timed Quiz

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

74/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, though one review mentions online quizzes that are not timed.

Not Timed Quiz
“6 quizzes that are not timed.”
PHED22B

Online

Online reviews mention weekly quizzes, a film-based midterm, and of proctoring or closed-book rules.

Weekly QuizzesMidterm Film AssignmentFinal PaperFinal Project
“The and the final was a fake cover letter, resume, and a reflection.”
KINS1
“There's 1 midterm and a paper (1200+ words) for the final.”
KINS2
“ .”
KINS2

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Easy A if you keep up with the work, and a little wiggle room if .”

Voice snapshots generated from 31 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

70/100

“ and provides great structure and ”

📈 Easy A Potential

78/100

“As long as you put in effort on all of the papers, discussions, and ”

📝 Workload Reality

48/100

“Lots of .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor was great at communicating even though she had many online courses.
  • she is very friendly and course.
  • Instructions for and poorly communicated.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades

  • She gives out A LOT of .
  • The ! Just make sure to read her instructions.
  • Not much else I can say besides she is rude and .

Theme 3

🗓️

  • MAKE SURE TO BE ON
  • This course is well laid out as an online class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

31

Recent reviews read by the AI

30

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-one reviews across online and , though older activity reviews are less relevant to recent online complaints.

Inside 31 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 517
4 out of 56
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 55

Course coverage

KINS19 reviews
KINES5 reviews
KINS25 reviews
PILAT023 reviews
PHED20A2 reviews
Show 6 more courses
PHED22B2 reviews
207341 review
PHED20471 review
TAG47B1 review
VOLLEYBALL1 review
VOLLEYBALLTEAM1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

22 reported outcomes

A range

17

A+ 4 · A 13

B range

2

B+ 2

C range

2

C 1 · C- 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values