AI Rate Professor

Graphic Design

DeAnna Gossett

GID56 · GID77 · GID57 · 24 lifetime ratings

AI rating
33/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
58.82%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if you are comfortable teaching yourself from modules and textbooks while meeting strict deadlines.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHighly Polarized ReviewsSelf-Taught Web DesignStrict Late WorkSlow or Limited FeedbackHomework-Heavy
  • Reviews are extremely polarized, with some students praising structure and others calling the course unsupported.
  • Online students frequently report self-teaching, slow feedback, no late work, and .
  • Students who are independent and , but struggling beginners may feel abandoned.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

High grades are possible for organized self-starters, but strict deadlines, tough grading, and .

Online reviews include both easy A comments and severe workload complaints, while with homework.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The material is manageable for independent learners but hard for beginners who need clearer instruction and support.

Online students more often describe self-teaching and confusing materials, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Late work is repeatedly described as not accepted, making schedule .

Online reviews provide the strongest evidence of strict deadline policies, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

She is recommended by independent students who like structured modules, but many others warn against her for poor support and feedback.

Online recommendation is very polarized and often negative, while but limited.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Reviews repeatedly mention , and point deductions.

Format shift

Strict grading concerns are strongest online, while and positive structure.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students often describe lots of , and weekly web projects.

Format shift

Online reviews provide the clearest heavy-workload evidence, while .

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Teaching quality is inconsistent, with praise for modules and care offset by repeated complaints about hands-off instruction and .

Format shift

Online reviews are much more negative and polarized, while complaint.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

The course appears assignment-heavy, with quizzes and tests mentioned but , and textbook tasks dominating comments.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize quizzes and textbook assignments, while and skill-building projects.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, and learning, but one review reports poor communication and delayed project information.

Main concern

Students may still need to be proactive and stay on schedule with homework.

What students said

“Teacher is very caring and willing to help students when they need help.”
GID57
“Be always on time with HW because you are building up the skills with each assignment.”
GID57
“Not a full time professor and do not provide a .”
GID57

Remote format

Online

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are sharply divided, with strong praise for helpful modules from some students and severe criticism , and textbook-driven teaching from others.

Main concern

The biggest risk is needing to teach yourself while receiving slow or .

What students said

“If you want to teach yourself code with zero support it's a great class for you.”
GID57
“If you're lazy or a procrastinator, you will suffer because she doesn't accept late work.”
GID56
“ and tedious (5-10 hours).”
GID57

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes and testing issues, but do not clearly prove open-book rules, webcam rules, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, midterm format, or .

QuizzesTesting With Textbook DetailsAssignmentsNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Varies

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, book policy, midterms, or finals.

Online

Online reviews mention quizzes, tests, and textbook-based answers, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

QuizzesTesting With Textbook DetailsBroken QuizzesAssignments
“Unnecessary information in testing, featuring secret answers that you have to go diving for in the textbook she provides.”
GID57
“broken quizzes”
GID57
“The only drawbacks are the quizzes because you have to apply and understand instead of regurgitating.”
GID57

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you want to teach yourself code with zero support it's a great class for you.”

Voice snapshots generated from 24 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“You have to do everything yourself.”

📚 Workload Pressure

25/100

“ and tedious (5-10 hours).”

⚖️

28/100

“she doesn't accept late work”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She just supervises as you work through an online textbook.
  • Her modules are info-packed and concise and .
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you're lazy or a procrastinator, you will suffer because she doesn't accept late work.
  • The answers to questions change and yes the course material is incredibly repetitive.
  • Be always on time with HW because you are building up the skills with each assignment.

Theme 3

💬

  • .
  • This professor takes the time to interact with every student and is a very fair person
  • She is also very slow in responding to your messages.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

24

Recent reviews read by the AI

24

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-four reviews across many years provide rich detail, though the professor is highly polarizing and format differences matter.

Inside 24 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 53
1 out of 57

Course coverage

GID5716 reviews
GID564 reviews
GID773 reviews
GID 571 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

18 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 2 · A 7 · A- 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 4