AI Rate Professor

Computer Information Systems

LaDawn Meade

CIS12 · CS2B · CS12A · CS2A · CIS68C · CS31A · CS1B · CS1A · CS3B · CS30A · 21B · CS22A · CS3A · CIS68 · CS30ALINUX · CSF001A · 64 lifetime ratings

AI rating
76/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
73.33%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you can self-study and tolerate uneven explanations.

Best fit · Self Taught ProEasy ASelf-PacedLenient Late WorkExample-Based VideosSelf-Study Heavy
  • Students often earn A grades because late work is lenient and .
  • many praise short example videos, while .
  • The use modules, videos, and outside resources without needing frequent support.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

Grades are usually easy because late , and many A students still criticize the teaching.

Online evidence strongly supports an easy A through flexible deadlines, while but slightly more challenge in some courses.

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

The grading is easy, but CS concepts, projects, and challenging.

Online students more often describe self-teaching, while become challenging.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

92/100

Many sections are self-paced, asynchronous, or allow work to be submitted late with little or no penalty.

Online reviews strongly support flexibility, and work until the final.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

She is worth it for flexible grading and examples, but not ideal for .

Both formats are mixed, with online reviews more polarized and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

88/100

Many students report , and late work accepted with no penalty.

Format shift

Online reviews show the strongest leniency, while and easy grades.

Workload

Moderate

65/100

Workload is usually manageable but , and significant self-study time.

Format shift

Online workload varies by course and ; in-person workload is often described as just right or progressively challenging.

Teaching experience

Average

65/100

Her example videos help many students, but repeated complaints cite confusing , and self-teaching.

Format shift

Online teaching feedback is highly polarized, while confusing notes.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and finals rather than relying on only one category.

Format shift

Online reviews give clearer evidence of quizzes, projects, midterms, and finals; and projects.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

but often positive, with students praising examples, beginner-friendly progression, and flexible deadlines while .

Main concern

Some .

What students said

“I had zero coding experience before this class and I liked how the and got more challenging as the class went on.”
CS3A
“Notes and modules are all over the .”
CS31A

Remote format

Online

33 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews emphasize flexible deadlines, easy grading, short videos, and a self-paced structure, but and slow responses.

Main concern

Online students may need outside resources because support and .

What students said

“Easy A if you can self study.”
CS2B
“Heavy self-learning environment (beware).”
CS1B

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and quizzes, with some open or retakeable elements, but policies vary by course.

Straightforward TestsRetakeable QuizzesMidterm And FinalOpen Tests MentionedProjects And Exams

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

76/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and finals, but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, or closed-book rules.

Assignments And ProjectsFinal MentionedReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy
“You can turn in things late up to the .”
CS3A
“Many mistakes and missing things in quizes, assignments, and lectures.”
CS22A

Online

Online reviews and finals, and at least one open-test format, but do not prove webcam or proctoring rules.

Straightforward TestsRetakeable QuizzesMidterm And FinalOpen Tests MentionedNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“This professor has straightforward tests and .”
CS3A
“The tests are completely open so you can get the compiler to give you the answers if .”
CS2A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Easy A if you can self study.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and assessment style. Credibility rating: High.

📈 Easy A Potential

86/100

“Easy A if you can self study.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

65/100

“Her short example videos are addictive.”

🕒 Flexibility

92/100

“Allows late work for full credit up until the date of the final.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Great examples . Love the lecture videos where she explains the example .
  • Her lectures are a bunch of word vomit and unnecessarily overcomplicate the material.
  • The way she teaches is through a lot of examples well-explained in her modules.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Class is overall easy, she lets you turn in late work and no live class.
  • Projects and .
  • The but fun.

Theme 3

🧭 About Structure And Support

  • Heavy self-learning environment (beware).
  • The instructor responded really quick to questions.
  • Slow to grade and , and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

64

Lifetime ratings

95/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis draws on 50 reviews over many years across online and and detailed patterns.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 532
4 out of 514
3 out of 55
2 out of 55
1 out of 58

Course coverage

CS1A15 reviews
CS3A9 reviews
CS2A4 reviews
CS2B3 reviews
CSF001A3 reviews
Show 11 more courses
CS1B2 reviews
CS22A2 reviews
CS30A2 reviews
CS31A2 reviews
CS3B2 reviews
21B1 review
CIS121 review
CIS681 review
CIS68C1 review
CS12A1 review
CS30ALINUX1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

38 reported outcomes

A range

34

A+ 5 · A 28 · A- 1

B range

2

B 1 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 1 · Not_Sure_Yet 1