AI Rate Professor

English

Paul Glanting

ENGL1B · ENG1A · ENGL1A · ENGL1AH · BUS300 · ENGL50C · ENGL110 · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
94.44%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you want a and writing feel worthwhile.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyExceptional FeedbackCaring MentorEngaging LecturesWriting HeavyHighly Recommended
  • Students overwhelmingly describe him as , and one of .
  • The class requires meaningful reading and writing, but students often say the work is worthwhile and manageable.
  • Grades are strong , and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

74/100

A grades are common, but students must read, write, revise, and .

Online reviews frame the effort as manageable and rewarding, while and grade ceilings.

Is the course easy?

Standard

54/100

The material is approachable because he teaches well, but , and honors work keep it intellectually real.

Online and in-person reviews agree that the course is not effortless, with .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

68/100

Reviews emphasize engagement, discussion, office hours, and Zoom support, but do .

Online reviews mention Zoom engagement and discussions, while and office hours without a strict policy.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

Students recommend him enthusiastically because , and makes English feel meaningful.

Both online and in-person reviews are highly positive, with online comments especially enthusiastic.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

72/100

, and fair grades, but essays still need effort and he rarely grades above the mid-90s.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize revisions and support; in-person reviews mention both leniency and a .

Workload

Moderate

52/100

The , and major projects, but students usually see it as purposeful rather than busywork.

Format shift

Online reviews call the workload manageable and meaningful, while in-person reviews include the and essays.

Teaching experience

Excellent

98/100

Students , and ability to make writing engaging.

Format shift

Both online and meaningful format weakness.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Assessment is dominated by , and revisions rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

Both formats describe writing-based assessment, with online reviews specifically noting essays and a research project.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are also strongly positive, emphasizing office-hour feedback, caring support, engaging lectures, and fair grade opportunities.

Main concern

Some students find the essays demanding and note that he rarely gives near-perfect scores.

What students said

“One of the .”
ENGL1B
“His homework are really demanding along with the 3 essays.”
ENG1A
“it should be a relatively easy A.”
ENG1A

Remote format

Online

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Online reviews are extremely positive, praising engaging , and manageable major projects.

Main concern

Online honors and English , and research.

What students said

“One of the .”
ENGL1B
“The work was more time consuming BUT ”
ENGL1AH
“A must-take!”
ENG1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because reviews describe writing finals and projects rather than proctored tests, but .

Essay FinalResearch Project FinalReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but they do not clearly prove closed-book rules or proctoring policy.

Essay FinalReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy
“I hate the final because it's 10 page essay”
ENG1A

Online

Online reviews mention three essays and a research project final, but they do not clearly .

Research Project FinalEssaysReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring
“ .”
ENG1A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“One of the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 18 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, support, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

98/100

“His lectures are concise, easy to follow, and genuinely set you up for success.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

96/100

“TAKE HIS CLASS.”

✍️ Writing Workload

52/100

“The work was more time consuming BUT ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His lectures are concise, easy to follow, and genuinely set you up for success.
  • He makes lectures refreshingly fun and also makes sure that his students are heard in discussions.
  • His online lectures are interactive, which a lot of professors in the online space struggle with.

Theme 2

❤️ About Support

  • .
  • He wants you to do well in his class.
  • and would make sure that no one gets left behind.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload & Grades

  • There was more writing and research, but .
  • His homework are really demanding along with the 3 essays.
  • if you ask him.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

18

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

96/100

Evidence confidence

Eighteen detailed reviews across multiple years and formats show unusually consistent praise with .

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 517
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG1A6 reviews
ENGL1AH5 reviews
ENGL1B3 reviews
BUS3001 review
ENGL1101 review
Show 2 more courses
ENGL1A1 review
ENGL50C1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

15 reported outcomes

A range

13

A+ 1 · A 10 · A- 2

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1